Howdy all,
I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12.
My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to libpd + Pd core 0.51?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
I'd say go for 0.51, or is there a good reason not to?
Is multi-instance support for messages and MIDI on the roadmap to be included in Pd 0.52 and libpd 0.13 ?
On 08.07.20 11:23, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Howdy all,
I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12.
My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to libpd + Pd core 0.51?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Multi instance and 64 bit for the next Pd and libpd would be great. Camomile would help to make a super solid "export to VST"!
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020, 11:38 Max abonnements@revolwear.com wrote:
I'd say go for 0.51, or is there a good reason not to?
Is multi-instance support for messages and MIDI on the roadmap to be included in Pd 0.52 and libpd 0.13 ?
On 08.07.20 11:23, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Howdy all,
I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12.
My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to libpd + Pd core 0.51?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Multi instance
To be clear, Pd / libpd already have multiinstance support for a while now, only a few things like multiinstance MIDI hooks are missing.
64 bit
I guess you mean double precision? I know I'm being a bit pedantic here, but this has been an endless source of confusion. Anyway, Pd 0.51 is more or less ready for double precision, you just have to compile with -DPD_FLOATSIZE=64
Christof
On 08.07.2020 11:45, alfonso santimone wrote:
Multi instance and 64 bit for the next Pd and libpd would be great. Camomile would help to make a super solid "export to VST"!
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020, 11:38 Max <abonnements@revolwear.com mailto:abonnements@revolwear.com> wrote:
I'd say go for 0.51, or is there a good reason not to? Is multi-instance support for messages and MIDI on the roadmap to be included in Pd 0.52 and libpd 0.13 ? On 08.07.20 11:23, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Howdy all, > > I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was > waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / > iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the > current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely > time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12. > > My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay > with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to > libpd + Pd core 0.51? > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com> <http://danomatika.com> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com> <http://robotcowboy.com> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I'd say the same as Max, 0.51 would be nice, I personally don't need to halt at 0.50-2.
Le mer. 8 juil. 2020 à 11:35, Max abonnements@revolwear.com a écrit :
I'd say go for 0.51, or is there a good reason not to?
Is multi-instance support for messages and MIDI on the roadmap to be included in Pd 0.52 and libpd 0.13 ?
On 08.07.20 11:23, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Howdy all,
I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12.
My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to libpd + Pd core 0.51?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Yep, no need for a 0.50 version as far as I can see. I've already compiled a local version of libpd using 0.51 (only had to add s_net.c to the libpd makefile to do it) and am trying to recompile Camomile to use it so I can get hold of some new features by one Dan Wilcox :)
cheers Miller
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 12:28:46PM +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
I'd say the same as Max, 0.51 would be nice, I personally don't need to halt at 0.50-2.
Le mer. 8 juil. 2020 ?? 11:35, Max abonnements@revolwear.com a ??crit :
I'd say go for 0.51, or is there a good reason not to?
Is multi-instance support for messages and MIDI on the roadmap to be included in Pd 0.52 and libpd 0.13 ?
On 08.07.20 11:23, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Howdy all,
I have been admittedly behind in releasing libpd 0.12, mainly as I was waiting on implementing and testing much needed changes for the Obj-C / iOS wrapper. We have generally tried to keep libpd up to date with the current core releases and now that Pd 0.51 is released, it's definitely time to put out what we have for libpd 0.12.
My question to those of you using libpd is: Should the next release stay with the current Pd core 0.50-2 or should we skip it and go directly to libpd + Pd core 0.51?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://twitter.com/danomatika__;!!Mih3wA!ScAByzm... > danomatika.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://danomatika.com__;!!Mih3wA!ScAByzmyOnqO4hq... > robotcowboy.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://robotcowboy.com__;!!Mih3wA!ScAByzmyOnqO4h... >
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!...
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!...
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!...
-
alfonso santimone -
Antoine Rousseau -
Christof Ressi -
Dan Wilcox -
Max -
Miller Puckette