Hi,
I have a problem with pd-extended and maxlib scale vs. GEM scale object. In fact I need the maxlib scale, but GEM scale is loading. I have tried to change the startup order to load libs - with no effect. Also I have tried to name it [maxlib_scale...] as mentioned somewhere in the mailinglist archives - also with no effect.
What is the correct workaround of the nameclashing problem in pd-extended????
thx
rainer
Use [maxlib/scale]. If you change the library order, then your patch
might only work on that particular install. Making it work with the
default preferences means that it'll work on any default Pd-extended
0.42 install.
.hc
On May 27, 2011, at 7:15 AM, rainer _ wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with pd-extended and maxlib scale vs. GEM scale
object. In fact I need the maxlib scale, but GEM scale is loading. I
have tried to change the startup order to load libs - with no
effect. Also I have tried to name it [maxlib_scale...] as mentioned
somewhere in the mailinglist archives - also with no effect.What is the correct workaround of the nameclashing problem in pd- extended????
thx
rainer _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.
....[maxlib/scale], that works - thanks!!!
From: hans@at.or.at To: jepoxy@hotmail.com Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:08:17 -0400 CC: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] pd-0.42 extended +nameclashes
Use [maxlib/scale]. If you change the library order, then your patch might only work on that particular install. Making it work with the default preferences means that it'll work on any default Pd-extended 0.42 install. .hc On May 27, 2011, at 7:15 AM, rainer _ wrote:Hi,
I have a problem with pd-extended and maxlib scale vs. GEM scale object. In fact I need the maxlib scale, but GEM scale is loading. I have tried to change the startup order to load libs - with no effect. Also I have tried to name it [maxlib_scale...] as mentioned somewhere in the mailinglist archives - also with no effect.
What is the correct workaround of the nameclashing problem in pd-extended????
thx
rainer _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute. - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list