marius schebella wrote: 2) Is it possible to get microsecond accuracy in metro? the difference between metro 200 and 200.5 would be one beat per minute. for synchronizing a big difference. marius.
[metro] is very accurate over time, it just has a jitter as the bangs have to happen in between sample blocks, but if you measure over say one hour the timing is very accurate. I can run a hydrogen drum pattern with a pd midi patch both running at the same tempo and they stay in sync all day long, (or until hydrogen crashes because of its outrageously photorealist gui...I generally run with all windows minimized.)
Martin
Hallo, martin.peach@sympatico.ca hat gesagt: // martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
[metro] is very accurate over time, it just has a jitter as the bangs have to happen in between sample blocks
What do you mean by this "bangs have to happen in between sample blocks"? The bangs from metro AFAIK happen independent from the sample blocks.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 20:59 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, martin.peach@sympatico.ca hat gesagt: // martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
[metro] is very accurate over time, it just has a jitter as the bangs have to happen in between sample blocks
What do you mean by this "bangs have to happen in between sample blocks"? The bangs from metro AFAIK happen independent from the sample blocks.
in order to make this discussion more confusing, i say: afaik, it depends which object receives the bang from the [metro]. when it is [vline~] or [vsnapshot~], then it is independent from sample blocks, but when the receiver is the phase inlet of an oscillator or [tabwrite~], then the bang happens on the boundaries. personally, i find that a bit confusing and i would like all these objects to behave the same, namely independent from sample blocks.
the same two cents again
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de