Are there no binary versions of Gem for G5s running Osx 10.4? What are the special compilation flags needed to set? thanks, Ae.
Just about any GEM binary for OSX you could locate will work on a G5 running 10.4. If you want to compile it yourself the most important flag is -faltivec.
On 5/20/06, Amos Elmaliah amos.elmaliah@interfaculty.nl wrote:
Are there no binary versions of Gem for G5s running Osx 10.4? What are the special compilation flags needed to set? thanks, Ae.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
Is there any method to receive a "bang" ONLY when I start or finishes pressing a key on the keyboard? (and not in-between)
In attach, the patch for better understanding.
Thanks.
Carlos Caires
[key] gives you data on key down, [keyup] on up, and [keyname] give
you both in a different format.
.hc
On May 24, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Carlos Caires wrote:
Hi,
Is there any method to receive a "bang" ONLY when I start or
finishes pressing a key on the keyboard? (and not in-between)In attach, the patch for better understanding.
Thanks.
Carlos Caires <bang-question.pd> _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
i use os x, and have set my system preferences so that the keyboard repeat rate is set to 'never'.
i asked this question a while ago, and some people sent patches that used [timer] to limit 're-bangs'. but there always seemed to be stray bangs that sneaked through.
if anyone knows a real answer to this question, i am also very keen to hear it.
thanks
Thanks a lot, I put the "keyboard repeat rate" to 0, and it seems to work for now. Thanks again, Carlos
On 06/05/24 16:02, "hard off" hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i use os x, and have set my system preferences so that the keyboard repeat rate is set to 'never'.
i asked this question a while ago, and some people sent patches that used [timer] to limit 're-bangs'. but there always seemed to be stray bangs that sneaked through.
if anyone knows a real answer to this question, i am also very keen to hear it.
thanks
another possibility: use "onebang" to filter out repeat keyvalues
try this:
#N canvas 0 0 454 304 10; #X obj 93 54 key; #X obj 162 53 keyup; #X obj 93 81 sel 113; #X obj 93 147 onebang; #X obj 162 80 sel 113; #X msg 93 174 on; #X msg 162 178 off; #X obj 110 114 loadbang; #X text 36 80 press q; #X obj 93 211 print; #X connect 0 0 2 0; #X connect 1 0 4 0; #X connect 2 0 3 0; #X connect 3 0 5 0; #X connect 4 0 3 1; #X connect 4 0 6 0; #X connect 5 0 9 0; #X connect 6 0 9 0; #X connect 7 0 3 1;
ciao
oliver
Carlos Caires wrote:
Thanks a lot, I put the "keyboard repeat rate" to 0, and it seems to work for now. Thanks again, Carlos
On 06/05/24 16:02, "hard off" hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i use os x, and have set my system preferences so that the keyboard repeat rate is set to 'never'.
i asked this question a while ago, and some people sent patches that used [timer] to limit 're-bangs'. but there always seemed to be stray bangs that sneaked through.
if anyone knows a real answer to this question, i am also very keen to hear it.
thanks
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Try these setups.
I've had to deal with this a few times. I work on Windows XP at home, and OSX at school, and I can't change the options on the school's computers. I had to use the [operating_system] object to tell my program which keystroke-reading function to use. My problem had to do with wanting to use Control-keystrokes, so it had to only output a bang when both keys were pressed. I think your dilemma is simpler.
One thing I noticed- I don't remember which operating system it was- was that sometimes a key-press and key-up on the same key returned different names with [keyname]. Also, one of the shift or alt keys said R when it meant L or vice versa. So you might run into a few bugs with stuff like that.
-Chuckk
On 5/24/06, Carlos Caires ccaires@porto.ucp.pt wrote:
Hi,
Is there any method to receive a "bang" ONLY when I start or finishes pressing a key on the keyboard? (and not in-between)
In attach, the patch for better understanding.
Thanks.
Carlos Caires _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I forgot to mention, you'll have to change the outlets in my patch to whatever you are using, [print] or whatever. I didn't want to set them all to print, or it would start the messages as soon as you opened it.
On 5/24/06, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Try these setups.
I've had to deal with this a few times. I work on Windows XP at home, and OSX at school, and I can't change the options on the school's computers. I had to use the [operating_system] object to tell my program which keystroke-reading function to use. My problem had to do with wanting to use Control-keystrokes, so it had to only output a bang when both keys were pressed. I think your dilemma is simpler.
One thing I noticed- I don't remember which operating system it was- was that sometimes a key-press and key-up on the same key returned different names with [keyname]. Also, one of the shift or alt keys said R when it meant L or vice versa. So you might run into a few bugs with stuff like that.
-Chuckk
On 5/24/06, Carlos Caires ccaires@porto.ucp.pt wrote:
Hi,
Is there any method to receive a "bang" ONLY when I start or finishes pressing a key on the keyboard? (and not in-between)
In attach, the patch for better understanding.
Thanks.
Carlos Caires _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Thanks -
Chris, I will try compiling it, see what that brings... :) AE. On 21 May 2006, at 17:40, chris clepper wrote:
Just about any GEM binary for OSX you could locate will work on a
G5 running 10.4. If you want to compile it yourself the most
important flag is -faltivec.On 5/20/06, Amos Elmaliah amos.elmaliah@interfaculty.nl wrote: Are there no binary versions of Gem for G5s running Osx 10.4? What are the special compilation flags needed to set? thanks, Ae.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
Thanks -
Chris, I will try compiling it, see what that brings... :) AE. On 21 May 2006, at 17:40, chris clepper wrote:
Just about any GEM binary for OSX you could locate will work on a
G5 running 10.4. If you want to compile it yourself the most
important flag is -faltivec.On 5/20/06, Amos Elmaliah amos.elmaliah@interfaculty.nl wrote: Are there no binary versions of Gem for G5s running Osx 10.4? What are the special compilation flags needed to set? thanks, Ae.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list