hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same problem on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that?
There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
.hc
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same problem
on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
At 01:57 2009-01-08, Hans wrote:
My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that? There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
I was not loading the hexloader, but it seems libdir is the culprit (or is this the same? - i've been reading some stuff in the archives, but i find it quite confusing and might be missing some bits). When i remove all other libraries except libdir from startup, the patches still load so slow. when i remove just libdir, they open immediately, but then the other externals don't get loaded automatically anymore.. i can live with it that way, but it ould be nice if it worked some time in the future.. xof
.hc
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same problem on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I haven't heard of libdir causing problems, its been around since
0.38. I am guessing that the problem is in one of the ilbraries that
is loaded after libdir is. Then if you don't load libdir, that
library doesn't get loaded.
'libdir' is support for the libdir library format.
.hc
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:19 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
At 01:57 2009-01-08, Hans wrote:
My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that? There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
I was not loading the hexloader, but it seems libdir is the culprit (or is this the same? - i've been reading some stuff in the archives, but i find it quite confusing and might be missing some bits). When i remove all other libraries except libdir from startup, the patches still load so slow. when i remove just libdir, they open immediately, but then the other externals don't get loaded automatically anymore.. i can live with it that way, but it ould be nice if it worked some time in the future.. xof
.hc
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended
takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same problem on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Strange. I tried extended 0.40.3 with only libdir and no other libraries (removed them from the registry) and it was still so slow. But with 0.39.3 and all of its default libraries my patches load in a couple of seconds.. but i don't see libdir in 0.39.3's pd-settings.reg also..
xof
At 01:45 2009-01-09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I haven't heard of libdir causing problems, its been around since 0.38. I am guessing that the problem is in one of the ilbraries that is loaded after libdir is. Then if you don't load libdir, that library doesn't get loaded.
'libdir' is support for the libdir library format.
.hc
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:19 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
At 01:57 2009-01-08, Hans wrote:
My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that? There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
I was not loading the hexloader, but it seems libdir is the culprit (or is this the same? - i've been reading some stuff in the archives, but i find it quite confusing and might be missing some bits). When i remove all other libraries except libdir from startup, the patches still load so slow. when i remove just libdir, they open immediately, but then the other externals don't get loaded automatically anymore.. i can live with it that way, but it ould be nice if it worked some time in the future.. xof
.hc
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same problem on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
With Pd-extended 0.39.3, the libdir code was compiled in as part of
it. A library could also be loaded using [declare] or [import].
It is possible there is a bug in the libdir code, but it is something
that I have never seen, so I can't troubleshoot it. If you can make a
patch that reproduces the problem every time, then post it and I'll
have a look.
.hc
On Jan 9, 2009, at 3:33 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
Strange. I tried extended 0.40.3 with only libdir and no other
libraries (removed them from the registry) and it was still so
slow. But with 0.39.3 and all of its default libraries my patches
load in a couple of seconds.. but i don't see libdir in 0.39.3's pd- settings.reg also..xof
At 01:45 2009-01-09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I haven't heard of libdir causing problems, its been around since 0.38. I am guessing that the problem is in one of the ilbraries that is loaded after libdir is. Then if you don't load libdir, that library doesn't get loaded.
'libdir' is support for the libdir library format.
.hc
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:19 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
At 01:57 2009-01-08, Hans wrote:
My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that? There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
I was not loading the hexloader, but it seems libdir is the culprit (or is this the same? - i've been reading some stuff in the
archives, but i find it quite confusing and might be missing some bits). When i remove all other libraries except libdir from startup, the patches still load so slow. when i remove just libdir, they open immediately, but then the other externals don't get loaded automatically anymore.. i can live with it that way, but it ould be nice if it worked some time in the future.. xof.hc
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
hi, I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended takes sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu. I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same
problem on both.. Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of
it? thanks, Kristof
info@kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net http://myspace.com/xofxof ____________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
kristof lauwers