Hi, I'm generating a variable, but finite sequence of numeric data-pairs (between 5 - 15 pairs) and want to retrieve each pair on demand, in the sequence generated. I've tried using qlist, but this returns the entire sequence in one go. I've also tried to use different combinations of set/append/get, but can't work out how to do it.
I've spent a lot of time on this already and have run out of ideas. Can anyone suggest a solution? (I too am new to PD.)
Cheers DC
hi,
if you would always want to get the pairs in the original sequence,
use [textfile]. Storing: clear, add <a1> <b1>, add <a2> <b2>...'. Retrieving:bang' for every pair, `rewind' to repeat.
If you would need random access, use arrays.
Krzysztof
DCooper wrote: ...
I'm generating a variable, but finite sequence of numeric data-pairs (between 5 - 15 pairs) and want to retrieve each pair on demand, in the sequence generated. I've tried using qlist, but this returns the entire sequence in one go. I've also tried to use different combinations of set/append/get, but can't work out how to do it.
Hi,
I seem to recall a while back some discussion between Miller and Guenter about framp~ as a way to make a phase vocoder...
it seems framp~ can handle the complex data from fft~ objects to give amp, freq pairs, but has anyone actually done the resynthesis from pvoc data (i.e. gone from freq, amp pairs, back to complex data and ultimately back to sound)?
I want to do spectral stretching in the manner of Wishart's Vox 5 etc but don't want to repeat the work if it's been done already!
( I seem to remember Miller suggested a solution, but did anyone implement it or similar?)
cheers,
nick
hi i was working on this, but couldnŽt make it to a releasable version and i donŽt know someone else already did this. but iŽd like to dive into this again (fixed my lack of fft-knowledge now). sme
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Fells" nick@music.gla.ac.uk To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Cc: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: [PD] spectral stretching using phase vocoder??
Hi,
I seem to recall a while back some discussion between Miller and Guenter about framp~ as a way to make a phase vocoder...
it seems framp~ can handle the complex data from fft~ objects to give amp, freq pairs, but has anyone actually done the resynthesis from pvoc data (i.e. gone from freq, amp pairs, back to complex data and ultimately back to sound)?
I want to do spectral stretching in the manner of Wishart's Vox 5 etc but don't want to repeat the work if it's been done already!
( I seem to remember Miller suggested a solution, but did anyone implement it or similar?)
cheers,
nick
-- Dr Nick Fells, Music Department, University of Glasgow, Tel: +44 (0) 141-330 4096 Glasgow G12 8QQ Fax: +44 (0) 141-330 3518 UK. http://www.music.gla.ac.uk/~nick
I didn't do the implementation of it :(, The discussion started as a question what framp is really doing.
The solution Miller suggested was pd based, If you are going to do it, personally I would prefer an external (or rather an internal) to complete the phasevocoder path :)
Guenter
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Nick Fells wrote:
Hi,
I seem to recall a while back some discussion between Miller and Guenter about framp~ as a way to make a phase vocoder...
it seems framp~ can handle the complex data from fft~ objects to give amp, freq pairs, but has anyone actually done the resynthesis from pvoc data (i.e. gone from freq, amp pairs, back to complex data and ultimately back to sound)?
I want to do spectral stretching in the manner of Wishart's Vox 5 etc but don't want to repeat the work if it's been done already!
( I seem to remember Miller suggested a solution, but did anyone implement it or similar?)
cheers,
nick
-- Dr Nick Fells, Music Department, University of Glasgow, Tel: +44 (0) 141-330 4096 Glasgow G12 8QQ Fax: +44 (0) 141-330 3518 UK. http://www.music.gla.ac.uk/~nick
-
DCooper -
g�nter geiger -
Krzysztof Czaja -
Nick Fells -
sme