Hi everyone,
When I was learning ChucK I remember being able to do this with boolean logic: "Receive values from integer X. If X stays the same for a period of at least 1 second..." (to end this sentence in Pure Data) I'd like to send a single "bang". So I'd like to build something or find some object that "watches" a constantly changing number box and when it becomes stagnate (doesn't move from one number to the next) for a period of 1 second, I'd like to send a single "bang".
Thank you for reading my question, Sebastian
Not exactly sure what you meant by "stay the same". If, for example, you want to output a bang when there has
been no value sent to the input of "X" for one second, you could do this:
[int] <- equivalent of X
| [b] |
[del 1000] |
If, however, there is a continuous stream of numbers being sent to "X" and what you want is to send a bang when "X" has been receiving the same value for one second, you could do this:
[int] <- equivalent of X | [change] | [b] | [del 1000] |
-Jonathan
From: Sebastian Valenzuela svalenzuelamusic@gmail.com To: Pure Data Forum pd-list@iem.at Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:57 PM Subject: [PD] Detect a stagnate number
Hi everyone,
When I was learning ChucK I remember being able to do this with boolean logic: "Receive values from integer X. If X stays the same for a period of at least 1 second..." (to end this sentence in Pure Data) I'd like to send a single "bang". So I'd like to build something or find some object that "watches" a constantly changing number box and when it becomes stagnate (doesn't move from one number to the next) for a period of 1 second, I'd like to send a single "bang".
Thank you for reading my question, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list