hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
no, use "table $0-xyz" marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
but then i won't see the array in my patch - thats my problem. lg d13b
no, use "table $0-xyz" marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
evil hack but maybe:
[loadbang] -> [symbol $0-array] -> |rename array $1(
might work.
with the real disadvantages being that you wont be able to save the patch without breaking the patch :)
(well, you have to rename the array back to "array" before saving).
also, perhaps there might be some kind of race condition regarding the "array" at the beginning if you have several of these patches opening.
pix.
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 15:58:35 +0100 d dieb13@klingt.org wrote:
but then i won't see the array in my patch - thats my problem. lg d13b
no, use "table $0-xyz" marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
--
don't forget to say hello to echelon:
767, abhoermethoden, bombe, cia ,dump , echelon, freak, grundrecht, hacking, iridium, joint, kommunismus, lauschangriff, mailbombing, nur in den mund genommen, osama, pgp, querulant, rasterfahndung, stoersender, tristero, urheberrechtsverletzung, volxtheater, wanze, xenophob, yuan, zukunft
http://jokebux.klingt.org/
thanks, this is exactly what i do in the moment, but i ALWAYS forget to rename the array before closing :( regards d13b
evil hack but maybe:
[loadbang] -> [symbol $0-array] -> |rename array $1(
might work.
with the real disadvantages being that you wont be able to save the patch without breaking the patch :)
(well, you have to rename the array back to "array" before saving).
also, perhaps there might be some kind of race condition regarding the "array" at the beginning if you have several of these patches opening.
pix.
hi tried this, too but sometimes you open many instances of an array and pd doesnot know, which of them to rename, ... table is what i use maybe there is the possibility to use a message like ;pd-test.pd array 500 100 but then there appears a properties-dialog... it is also not a good solution to message :pd-nameoftable vis 1 because the properties of the table do not get saved!? marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 16:19 schrieb pix:
evil hack but maybe:
[loadbang] -> [symbol $0-array] -> |rename array $1(
might work.
with the real disadvantages being that you wont be able to save the patch without breaking the patch :)
(well, you have to rename the array back to "array" before saving).
also, perhaps there might be some kind of race condition regarding the "array" at the beginning if you have several of these patches opening.
pix.
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 15:58:35 +0100
d dieb13@klingt.org wrote:
but then i won't see the array in my patch - thats my problem. lg d13b
no, use "table $0-xyz" marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
--
don't forget to say hello to echelon:
767, abhoermethoden, bombe, cia ,dump , echelon, freak, grundrecht, hacking, iridium, joint, kommunismus, lauschangriff, mailbombing, nur in den mund genommen, osama, pgp, querulant, rasterfahndung, stoersender, tristero, urheberrechtsverletzung, volxtheater, wanze, xenophob, yuan, zukunft
http://jokebux.klingt.org/
I'll put on my do-list to see how Thomas does this for the IEM guis. He seems to have invented some hack for it... if I can understand it I'll stick it in the array code too...
cheers Miller
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:58:35PM +0100, d wrote:
but then i won't see the array in my patch - thats my problem. lg d13b
no, use "table $0-xyz" marius.
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
hi list! this question allready appeared on the list, but afaik there was never a solution:
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch. thanks for any hints regards d13b
--
don't forget to say hello to echelon:
767, abhoermethoden, bombe, cia ,dump , echelon, freak, grundrecht, hacking, iridium, joint, kommunismus, lauschangriff, mailbombing, nur in den mund genommen, osama, pgp, querulant, rasterfahndung, stoersender, tristero, urheberrechtsverletzung, volxtheater, wanze, xenophob, yuan, zukunft
http://jokebux.klingt.org/
hi i can't get "expr~ exp($v1)" to work. the non-tilde-object is ok. what am i doing wrong? marius.
Hi,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
i can't get "expr~ exp($v1)" to work. the non-tilde-object is ok. what am i doing wrong?
What exactly is the problem? I can create this just fine.
__ __
Frank Barknecht ____ ______ ____ __ trip\ \ / /wire ______
/ __// __ /__/ __// // __ \ / / __ \ ___\
/ / / ____/ / / / // ____// /\ \ ___\____ \
/_/ /_____/ /_/ /_//_____// / \ \_____\_____
/_/ _\
The functions in expr~ version 0.1 did not work. All functions are now working properly in version 0.3. Miller told me that he will include this version in about a week. I will also be putting out version 0.4 which will include access to the "value" object as well, so you can say "expr $f1+xxx" where "xxx" is a variable of a value object. If I finish this quickly, it will hopefully make it in the next release of pd.
I am sorry to have been slow in passing the new version to Miller, however, you can download version 0.3 from http://crca.ucsd.edu/~yadegari/expr.html where you will find documentation about the expr family objects as well.
Shahrokh.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, marius schebella wrote:
hi i can't get "expr~ exp($v1)" to work. the non-tilde-object is ok. what am i doing wrong? marius.
hi,
another solution for d would be using the (experimental?) `graph on parent' property of [table]'s window -- if only properties of [table]s were persistent...
Well, after all there are so many wishes for array (and table) features... having dollars survive saving would be nice too, of course.
Another wish would be to apply this simple patch to g_canvas.c in test8 (it is needed anyway!):
@@ -1043,11 +1043,13 @@ } if (f <= 1) f = 100;
which would allow using a temporary hack in d's case:
#X obj 20 200 table $0-t; #X obj 20 20 loadbang; #X obj 20 60 symbol $0-t; #X obj 20 100 makefilename pd-%s; #X msg 20 140 ; $1 coords 0 0 1 1 500 500 1; #X connect 1 0 2 0; #X connect 2 0 3 0; #X connect 3 0 4 0;
But then an attempt to open array's window would crash Pd -- yet another wish...
Krzysztof
Miller Puckette wrote:
I'll put on my do-list to see how Thomas does this for the IEM guis. He seems to have invented some hack for it... if I can understand it I'll stick it in the array code too...
...
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2002 14:53 schrieb d:
...
is it possible to give a unique $0-name to an array? $1-xyz or table $0-xyz workarounds won't help me because the array should be visible on my topmost patch.