On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.atwrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Laurent WILLKOMM wrote:
Am 2010-06-04 20:16, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Ok, its finally time to start the release process of Pd-extended 0.42.5 with the release of 0.42.5-rc1, available now! There are of course many bug fixes and additions, here are some highlights:
- fixing Graph-On-Parent GUI bugs
- complete 64-bit support for GNU/Linux
This is great! Currently there is only a 64-bit version for Ubuntu jaunty in the builds, will there be more?
If people with other 64-bit systems make builds, there will be :) The builds that are posted are all the machines that people have setup for builds. The Jaunty/64-bit machine is run by Andras Muranyi, for example.
A propos... i'm thinking about an upgrade to Lucid. I'd appreciate some input on my concerns please:
- Is 64-bit Lucid stable enough? (Usually 64 bit Ubuntus become stable a bit
later than 32-bit ones)
- Would you people want a regular Lucid build rather than a Jaunty one? (ie.
are most of you on Lucid already?)
Andras
I'm still in Karmic Koala, both 64 (UbuntuStudio) and canonical one. Karmic is working fine for me, so haven't done the upgrade - and I guess I'll not do it soon - I like to wait some time before moving to another one.
Most people I know that are Linux users are either in Karmic or have upgraded to Lucid, only a few are using Jaunty, but I see that a lot of Pd folks use jaunty, right?
Best regards, Pedro
2010/6/5 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.atwrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Laurent WILLKOMM wrote:
Am 2010-06-04 20:16, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Ok, its finally time to start the release process of Pd-extended 0.42.5 with the release of 0.42.5-rc1, available now! There are of course many bug fixes and additions, here are some highlights:
- fixing Graph-On-Parent GUI bugs
- complete 64-bit support for GNU/Linux
This is great! Currently there is only a 64-bit version for Ubuntu jaunty in the builds, will there be more?
If people with other 64-bit systems make builds, there will be :) The builds that are posted are all the machines that people have setup for builds. The Jaunty/64-bit machine is run by Andras Muranyi, for example.
A propos... i'm thinking about an upgrade to Lucid. I'd appreciate some input on my concerns please:
- Is 64-bit Lucid stable enough? (Usually 64 bit Ubuntus become stable a
bit later than 32-bit ones)
- Would you people want a regular Lucid build rather than a Jaunty one?
(ie. are most of you on Lucid already?)
Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
2010/6/5 Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt
I'm still in Karmic Koala, both 64 (UbuntuStudio) and canonical one. Karmic is working fine for me, so haven't done the upgrade - and I guess I'll not do it soon - I like to wait some time before moving to another one.
Most people I know that are Linux users are either in Karmic or have upgraded to Lucid, only a few are using Jaunty, but I see that a lot of Pd folks use jaunty, right?
Best regards, Pedro
Some kind of download stats for the autobuild folder would be interesting to see. Is it available, or could someone just post a snapshot by any chance? Andras
Yep, would be nice, but those stats do not account for everything (svn download + build).
best regards, Pedro
2010/6/5 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com
2010/6/5 Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt
I'm still in Karmic Koala, both 64 (UbuntuStudio) and canonical one. Karmic
is working fine for me, so haven't done the upgrade - and I guess I'll not do it soon - I like to wait some time before moving to another one.
Most people I know that are Linux users are either in Karmic or have upgraded to Lucid, only a few are using Jaunty, but I see that a lot of Pd folks use jaunty, right?
Best regards, Pedro
Some kind of download stats for the autobuild folder would be interesting to see. Is it available, or could someone just post a snapshot by any chance? Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I'm running 64bit Lucid on 2 machines (laptop + desktop) and It's been stable for me this past month. I'm running pd-extended from a build I did at the start of May: http://imartron.com/misc/Pd-0.42.5-extended-20100510ppa1~Lucid1.deb
-martin
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 19:17 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Laurent WILLKOMM wrote: Am 2010-06-04 20:16, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: Ok, its finally time to start the release process of Pd-extended 0.42.5 with the release of 0.42.5-rc1, available now! There are of course many bug fixes and additions, here are some highlights: * fixing Graph-On-Parent GUI bugs * complete 64-bit support for GNU/Linux This is great! Currently there is only a 64-bit version for Ubuntu jaunty in the builds, will there be more? If people with other 64-bit systems make builds, there will be :) The builds that are posted are all the machines that people have setup for builds. The Jaunty/64-bit machine is run by Andras Muranyi, for example.A propos... i'm thinking about an upgrade to Lucid. I'd appreciate some input on my concerns please:
- Is 64-bit Lucid stable enough? (Usually 64 bit Ubuntus become stable
a bit later than 32-bit ones)
- Would you people want a regular Lucid build rather than a Jaunty
one? (ie. are most of you on Lucid already?)
Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build
scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the
computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on
startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd- extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
.hc
On Jun 6, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Martin Eckart wrote:
I'm running 64bit Lucid on 2 machines (laptop + desktop) and It's been stable for me this past month. I'm running pd-extended from a build I did at the start of May: http://imartron.com/misc/Pd-0.42.5-extended-20100510ppa1~Lucid1.deb
-martin
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 19:17 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans@at.or.at wrote:On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Laurent WILLKOMM wrote: Am 2010-06-04 20:16, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: Ok, its finally time to start the release process of Pd-extended 0.42.5 with the release of 0.42.5-rc1, available now! There are of course many bug fixes and additions, here are some highlights: * fixing Graph-On-Parent GUI bugs * complete 64-bit support for GNU/Linux This is great! Currently there is only a 64-bit version for Ubuntu jaunty in the builds, will there be more? If people with other 64-bit systems make builds, there will be :) The builds that are posted are all the machines that people have setup for builds. The Jaunty/64-bit machine is run by Andras Muranyi, for example.A propos... i'm thinking about an upgrade to Lucid. I'd appreciate some input on my concerns please:
- Is 64-bit Lucid stable enough? (Usually 64 bit Ubuntus become
stable a bit later than 32-bit ones)
- Would you people want a regular Lucid build rather than a Jaunty
one? (ie. are most of you on Lucid already?)
Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. - David Zicarelli
2010/6/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
.hc
Can i wikify this?
Andras
On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:55 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/6/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build
scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If
the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on
startup, or something else.This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd- extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto- builder.sh
.hc
Can i wikify this?
Andras
Yes, that would be awesome!
.hc
'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling
away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-
collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf
Hi.
On 06/06/2010 11:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
I'm getting this each time I build from source:
install: cannot stat `/home/ailo/auto-build/pd-extended/externals/pidip/*.pd_linux': No such file or directory
Then I usually just go ahead with "make package" and install the .deb package. I don't know what I am missing though. Running on Lucid, amd64.
ailo wrote:
Hi.
On 06/06/2010 11:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
I'm getting this each time I build from source:
install: cannot stat `/home/ailo/auto-build/pd-extended/externals/pidip/*.pd_linux': No such file or directory
Then I usually just go ahead with "make package" and install the .deb package. I don't know what I am missing though. Running on Lucid, amd64.
My guess is that you are missing some build dependencies for PiDiP. Look i the build transcript in the pidip part to see the errors, and make sure you have all the needed packages installed.
.hc
I had become accustomed to not install libquicktime-dev, since it gave errors during build in the past. That was the missing library. Now everything works. Voilà !
On 06/08/2010 12:25 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
ailo wrote:
Hi.
On 06/06/2010 11:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
I'm getting this each time I build from source:
install: cannot stat `/home/ailo/auto-build/pd-extended/externals/pidip/*.pd_linux': No such file or directory
Then I usually just go ahead with "make package" and install the .deb package. I don't know what I am missing though. Running on Lucid, amd64.
My guess is that you are missing some build dependencies for PiDiP. Look i the build transcript in the pidip part to see the errors, and make sure you have all the needed packages installed.
.hc
On 06/08/2010 12:25 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
ailo wrote:
Hi.
On 06/06/2010 11:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on startup, or something else.
This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
I'm getting this each time I build from source:
install: cannot stat `/home/ailo/auto-build/pd-extended/externals/pidip/*.pd_linux': No such file or directory
Then I usually just go ahead with "make package" and install the .deb package. I don't know what I am missing though. Running on Lucid, amd64.
My guess is that you are missing some build dependencies for PiDiP. Look i the build transcript in the pidip part to see the errors, and make sure you have all the needed packages installed.
.hc
ailo wrote: I had become accustomed to not install libquicktime-dev, since it gave errors during build in the past. That was the missing library. Now everything works. Voilà!
You should post your build somewhere for people to try.
.hc
I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).
So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)?
-martin
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 17:32 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That build is old, how about making builds using the auto-build
scripts? Then it can automatically upload too if fully setup. If the
computer is not on all the time, it could be scheduled to run on
startup, or something else.This is how you set it up and run a build:
mkdir ~/auto-build cd ~/auto-build/ rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd- extended/ ~/auto-build/pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
.hc
2010/6/9 Martin Eckart imartron@gmail.com
I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).
So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)?
-martin
Hi Martin,
i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by tomorrow under this one: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
Andras
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/6/9 Martin Eckart imartron@gmail.com I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know
how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)?
-martin
Hi Martin,
i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by
tomorrow under this one: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the
same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more
Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for
the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one
autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at
all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
We don't need more than one build per platform posted. Since Andras
has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's the
one I'd prefer. Its all setup.
Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them
anywhere online. If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk
about how to make the uploads automatic.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
OK, cool. I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.
Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?
-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/6/9 Martin Eckart imartron@gmail.com I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).
So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)? -martinHi Martin,
i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by tomorrow under this one: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
We don't need more than one build per platform posted. Since Andras has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's the one I'd prefer. Its all setup.
Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them anywhere online. If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk about how to make the uploads automatic.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
So my first attempt compiled okay but without gmerlin support in Gem which is necessary for my patches at least. I just remembered that I need the gmerlin packages from Roman's PPA ( https://launchpad.net/~reduzierer/+archive/rdz-pd-extra+deps/ ) for it to work, so I've installed those and am compiling again. Maybe it is worth having 2 auto-builds? One normal and a second with gmerlin (and possibly other configurations) support?
-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:51 -0400, Martin Eckart wrote:
OK, cool. I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.
Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?
-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/6/9 Martin Eckart imartron@gmail.com I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).
So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)? -martinHi Martin,
i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by tomorrow under this one: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
We don't need more than one build per platform posted. Since Andras has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's the one I'd prefer. Its all setup.
Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them anywhere online. If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk about how to make the uploads automatic.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Its definitely worthwhile to have more builds. But in the interest of
simplicity, the 'official' downloads will be ones that run on only
'official' packages. The "Contributed Builds" can be anything.
.hc
On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Martin Eckart wrote:
So my first attempt compiled okay but without gmerlin support in Gem which is necessary for my patches at least. I just remembered that I need the gmerlin packages from Roman's PPA ( https://launchpad.net/~reduzierer/+archive/rdz-pd-extra+deps/ )
for it to work, so I've installed those and am compiling again. Maybe it is worth having 2 auto-builds? One normal and a second with gmerlin (and possibly other configurations) support?-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:51 -0400, Martin Eckart wrote:
OK, cool. I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.
Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?
-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/6/9 Martin Eckart imartron@gmail.com I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let you know how that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a directory called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your email introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't notice).
So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a daily? basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent package? Just on my own server (imartron.com)? -martinHi Martin,
i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by tomorrow under this one: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
We don't need more than one build per platform posted. Since Andras has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's
the one I'd prefer. Its all setup.Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them anywhere online. If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk about how to make the uploads automatic.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
kill your television
-
ailo -
András Murányi -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Martin Eckart -
Pedro Lopes