hello, I'm trying to optimize a patch to run it at the lowest possible latency. There is a subpatch with 6 bonk~ objects in it. This seems to be quite heavy on the cpu. As soon as I switch it on i get crackles. Is there a cheaper alternative to track attacks ? gr, Tim
Hi Tim,
If you can afford to lose some time resolution, you could change bonk~'s -hop argument to match the window size. I think it defaults to a hop that's half the window size. That should be half as many FFTs.
Is there any chance [env~] and a threshhold would be good enough in your situation? It's a lot cheaper, but as you probably know, much more prone to false attack reports.
Hope that helps, William
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM, tim vets timvets@gmail.com wrote:
hello, I'm trying to optimize a patch to run it at the lowest possible latency. There is a subpatch with 6 bonk~ objects in it. This seems to be quite heavy on the cpu. As soon as I switch it on i get crackles. Is there a cheaper alternative to track attacks ? gr, Tim _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list