this does not work for higher frequency signals (say 2000 hz), or i have not found the correct threshold setting yet :)
cheers
On 31 Oct 2016, at 13:18, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
[threshold~] | [tgl] | [sig~]
cheers c
Le 31/10/2016 à 13:05, Simon Iten a écrit :
hi list,
in the “real” circuit world it is really easy to divide a pulse by 2 with a flip flop circuit. is there a flip flop implementation for puredata somewhere?
i would like to divide an incoming audio pulse by 2 without much delay (avoiding fiddle~ and the like)
the pw of the original wave does not have to be preserved, square output is ok. (as in real world)
cheers
simon _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
it should work if you put it in a subpatch with a [switch~ 1 1 1]
cheers c
Le 31/10/2016 à 15:07, Simon Iten a écrit :
this does not work for higher frequency signals (say 2000 hz), or i have not found the correct threshold setting yet :)
cheers
On 31 Oct 2016, at 13:18, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
[threshold~] | [tgl] | [sig~]
cheers c
Le 31/10/2016 à 13:05, Simon Iten a écrit :
hi list,
in the “real” circuit world it is really easy to divide a pulse by 2 with a flip flop circuit. is there a flip flop implementation for puredata somewhere?
i would like to divide an incoming audio pulse by 2 without much delay (avoiding fiddle~ and the like)
the pw of the original wave does not have to be preserved, square output is ok. (as in real world)
cheers
simon _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
cyrille henry -
Simon Iten