Is the fractional part of the delay time simply truncated or is it rounded to the next integer?
And another one: I would love to have a (noninterpolating) delay that accepts delay times in samples instead of ms. Does something like that exist?
thanks
Andreas
It's rounded to the nearest integer number of audio samples (resolution 0.22 usec at 44.1kHz).
The "vd~" object has much greater resolution, but has to interpolate so doesn't have a flat frequency response as delread~ does.
cheers Miller
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:40:39PM +0200, Andreas Sumerauer wrote:
Is the fractional part of the delay time simply truncated or is it rounded to the next integer?
And another one: I would love to have a (noninterpolating) delay that accepts delay times in samples instead of ms. Does something like that exist?
thanks
Andreas
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
Miller Puckette schrieb:
It's rounded to the nearest integer number of audio samples (resolution 0.22 usec at 44.1kHz).
Thanks for the info.
The "vd~" object has much greater resolution, but has to interpolate so doesn't have a flat frequency response as delread~ does.
Yep, I was not very happy with the interpolator. So I made another one (currently only as an abstraction). I've sent an announcement to the list regarding the issue.
best regards
Andreas
-
Andreas Sumerauer -
Miller Puckette