On Nov 7, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Caio Barros wrote:
About the scale, do you have problems with midi note? I believe this would be the most compatible with other functions.
Well, normally I use midi note numbers or a transposed version thereof (especially : midi note minus a multiple of 12), but in this case, I have only implemented «white keys», and then, I wonder what you expect the interface to be, to implement the «black keys», and whether those numbers should be displayed as dièse or bémol.
You could have a method that sets accidental type. Zero for flats, 1 for sharps. ( I suppose you could also suppress accidentals but then you'd be notating the pitches incorrectly, and I don't see the purpose of doing that. ).
I think I will use the vertical space as something as equally divided as possible into midi notes, and then display all of them as either unaltered or dièse. Later, the latter part can be modified to show notes in any other chosen scale, maybe...
And I want an option to hide the clef de Sol (thinking of it in the context of using it as a [#many] component, hypothesising a future in which [#many] supports an abstraction name as its $1).
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
You could have a method that sets accidental type. Zero for flats, 1 for sharps.
Yeah, but I think it should be a manner that can be expanded to future support for armatures of any kind. (Are there scores that use accidental flats and accidental sharps at the same time ? How often does that happen ?)
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
Hello, we dont put accidental alterations to armature, we usually put it before a note, and eventually in parentheses.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt%C3%A9ration_%28solf%C3%A8ge%29
----- "Mathieu Bouchard" matju@artengine.ca a écrit :
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
You could have a method that sets accidental type. Zero for flats,
1
for sharps.
Yeah, but I think it should be a manner that can be expanded to future
support for armatures of any kind. (Are there scores that use accidental flats and accidental sharps at the same time ? How often does that happen ?)
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, patko wrote:
Hello, we dont put accidental alterations to armature, we usually put it before a note, and eventually in parentheses.
Hello, I'm talking about which armature should be considered implied when trying to display a note. E.g. suppose I have an [armature] object (hypothetical class) which shows a certain number of alterations. How do I communicate that info to nearby [note] objects, which should display notes relatively to that armature ?
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
-
jancsika＠yahoo.com -
Mathieu Bouchard -
patko