missing include?
part_color.cpp:17: papi.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [part_color.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Particles' make: *** [subdirs] Error 255
echo:/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Gnu# find ../../.. -name papi.h -print ../../../gem-0.86/src/AuxLibs/particle/papi.h
safe to use the one from .86?
Thanks Ben
Ben Bogart - FMPM/F1999 wrote:
missing include?
part_color.cpp:17: papi.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [part_color.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Particles' make: *** [subdirs] Error 255
echo:/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Gnu# find ../../.. -name papi.h -print ../../../gem-0.86/src/AuxLibs/particle/papi.h
safe to use the one from .86?
yes, nothing changed (as i remember)
but is there none under gem-0.87/../GemLibs/particle/papi.h ???
mfg.csa.r IOhannes
No I searched for papi.h with "find" and the only papi.h was in the old gem-0.86 directory. got missed somehow? I downloaded today.
tar -t -f ~bbogart/gem-0.87.tgz | grep papi.h returns nothing, no papi.h
Also has it now just become standard to name these distros .tgz even though they are not gzipped?!
Thanks Ben
On Wed, 22 May 2002, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Ben Bogart - FMPM/F1999 wrote:
missing include?
part_color.cpp:17: papi.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [part_color.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Particles' make: *** [subdirs] Error 255
echo:/usr/local/gem-0.87/src/Gnu# find ../../.. -name papi.h -print ../../../gem-0.86/src/AuxLibs/particle/papi.h
safe to use the one from .86?
yes, nothing changed (as i remember)
but is there none under gem-0.87/../GemLibs/particle/papi.h ???
mfg.csa.r IOhannes
Hi !
Ben Bogart - FMPM/F1999 wrote:
No I searched for papi.h with "find" and the only papi.h was in the old gem-0.86 directory. got missed somehow? I downloaded today.
tar -t -f ~bbogart/gem-0.87.tgz | grep papi.h returns nothing, no papi.h
sure it does not! the auxiliary libraries (now called GemLibs instead of AuxLibs) are now separated from the Gem-distribution. i always found it annoying that i had to download huge pieces of code/binaries (esp on windoze) that were almost never changing.
as you could see on http://iem.kug.ac.at/GEM there is this ominous GemLibs-0.1.tgz package
Also has it now just become standard to name these distros .tgz even though they are not gzipped?!
this is due to the browser you are using (konqueror ??): the files are gunzipped automatically. use something more sophisticated like "wget"
Thanks Ben
On Wed, 22 May 2002, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: