Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load? Thanks.
-Chuckk
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load?
If you can, try and build them from cvs (http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/mrpeach/osc/). Otherwise, Miller's pd is built with MSVC, so you could try them with that. I'm not sure if MinGW and MSVC dlls are compatible (or is it the pd.libs?) because I've never had the opportunity to try it.
Martin
I got this output trying to compile:
C:\pd-0.40-2\pd\extra>gcc routeOSC.c routeOSC.c:5: error: syntax error before '<' token routeOSC.c:9: error: stray '@' in program routeOSC.c:219:1: warning: character constant too long for its type routeOSC.c:313:55: too many decimal points in number
Does that sound pretty bad?
On 2/10/07, Martin Peach martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load?
If you can, try and build them from cvs (http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/mrpeach/osc/). Otherwise, Miller's pd is built with MSVC, so you could try them with that. I'm not sure if MinGW and MSVC dlls are compatible (or is it the pd.libs?) because I've never had the opportunity to try it.
Martin
Besides me being a moron... I'll try downloading the files now.
On 2/10/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
I got this output trying to compile:
C:\pd-0.40-2\pd\extra>gcc routeOSC.c routeOSC.c:5: error: syntax error before '<' token routeOSC.c:9: error: stray '@' in program routeOSC.c:219:1: warning: character constant too long for its type routeOSC.c:313:55: too many decimal points in number
Does that sound pretty bad?
On 2/10/07, Martin Peach martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load?
If you can, try and build them from cvs (http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/mrpeach/osc/). Otherwise, Miller's pd is built with MSVC, so you could try them with that. I'm not sure if MinGW and MSVC dlls are compatible (or is it the pd.libs?) because I've never had the opportunity to try it.
Martin
--
-Chuckk
I think I have Miller's binary. I never compiled for Windows before. I put the .c files in my /pd/src directory and typed 'gcc routeOSC.c' etc., and each says there are undefined references, which I take to mean it can't find m_pd.h. So the problem appears to be that I don't know how to do this... I'll see what I can figure out. -Chuckk
On 2/10/07, Martin Peach martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load?
If you can, try and build them from cvs (http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/mrpeach/osc/). Otherwise, Miller's pd is built with MSVC, so you could try them with that. I'm not sure if MinGW and MSVC dlls are compatible (or is it the pd.libs?) because I've never had the opportunity to try it.
Martin
have you tried using OSCx, which I believe is included in the extended build of Pd?
Steve
On 2/10/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load? Thanks.
-Chuckk
I should add that the OSCx objects are called "OSC-route", "sendOSC", and "dumpOSC".
Steve
On 2/11/07, Stephen Sinclair radarsat1@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried using OSCx, which I believe is included in the extended build of Pd?
Steve
On 2/10/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load? Thanks.
-Chuckk
I've run into this before. I prefer Pd 0.40-2; does anyone know if and where I can find this OSCx library by itself?
-Chuckk
On 2/11/07, Stephen Sinclair radarsat1@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried using OSCx, which I believe is included in the extended build of Pd?
Steve
On 2/10/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load? Thanks.
-Chuckk
I figured it out. Duh, I can take the files from the pd-extended folder. Pretty straightforward operation. Thanks, Steve.
-Chuckk
On 2/11/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
I've run into this before. I prefer Pd 0.40-2; does anyone know if and where I can find this OSCx library by itself?
-Chuckk
On 2/11/07, Stephen Sinclair radarsat1@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried using OSCx, which I believe is included in the extended build of Pd?
Steve
On 2/10/07, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to load routeOSC.dll, packOSC.dll, and unpackOSC.dll in Windows. All three are the compiled files from http://puredata.info/Members/martinrp/OSCobjects and Pd is unable to load any of them. I'm not entirely clear on this... If these were compiled with Visual C++ and I don't have that but MinGW, do I have to compile them with MinGW? If not, any other ideas why they won't load? Thanks.
-Chuckk
--
-Chuckk
-
Chuckk Hubbard -
Martin Peach -
Stephen Sinclair