when i run glxgears -info it says:
GL_RENDERER = Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX GL_VERSION = 1.2 Mesa 3.4.2 GL_VENDOR = VA Linux Systems, Inc. GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_histogram GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_polygon_offset GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_MESA_window_pos GL_MESA_resize_buffers GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_PGI_misc_hints GL_SGIS_pixel_texture GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp 2874 frames in 5.0 seconds = 574.800 FPS 3315 frames in 5.0 seconds = 663.000 FPS 3206 frames in 5.0 seconds = 641.200 FPS
but i can't see anything in the window... just black background....
what does glxinfo report ?
glxinfo:
name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: SGI server glx version string: 1.2 server glx extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context client glx vendor string: SGI client glx version string: 1.2 client glx extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context GLX extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc. OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4.2 OpenGL extensions: GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint, GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array, GL_EXT_histogram, GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_polygon_offset, GL_EXT_rescale_normal, GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, GL_EXT_texture3D, GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, GL_EXT_texture_object, GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_MESA_resize_buffers, GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_PGI_misc_hints, GL_SGIS_pixel_texture, GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp glu version: 1.3 glu extensions: GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
0x23 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None 0x24 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Slow 0x25 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 Slow 0x26 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 Slow 0x27 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None 0x28 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Slow 0x29 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 Slow 0x2a 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 Slow
i think it is probably radeon module which i successfully installed but after some problems.. i remember that it failed on other modules but radeon seemed to go well... donno...
any help with proposing good debugging technique....
take care
m@rcell.net
hi !
i think it is probably radeon module which i successfully installed but after some problems.. i remember that it failed on other modules but radeon seemed to go well... donno...
i agree, that i sounds like the problem is with your drivers. well, have you tried the "vesa" module ? it's very generic and works for my radeon on my notebook (though, of course, performance is not sufficient)
mfg.as.r IOhannes
I experienced similar problems with an ATI radeon 7500. On debian i managed to overcome them by installing the xlibmesa3, xserver and xlibmesa-dev packages from http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/
- compiling radeon.o from the drm-trunk-module sources on that site (he has
them for i386 and ppc). But being a lousy hacker I screwed those up prety fast whilst upgrading some other stuff... + i never got the radeon TV-out to work (Gatos and others didn't work for me).
Now I'm on Redhat 8 with the Planet CCRMA packages and low latency kernel. I threw out the radeon and got me a relativly cheap nvidia 440 MX. Nvidia offers linux drivers on their site >> They were realy easy to compile + install (although the dl-ed kernel-package is compiled with 2.95, compiling the nvidia drivers and module with 3.2 worked just fine) and give me nice 3d support,tv-out and twinview (dual screen / 1 desktop >> pd-patch on my monitor + gemwin on the TV-out). info : http://www.sh.nu/nvidia/ And Gem didn't segfault since...
hope this helps someone,
kurt
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: pd-list-admin@iem.kug.ac.at [mailto:pd-list-admin@iem.kug.ac.at]Namens zmoelnig@iem.at Verzonden: zondag 19 januari 2003 9:45 Aan: marcell mars CC: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Onderwerp: Re: [PD] Gem failed after compiled against gcc 3.2 on GentooLinux
hi !
i think it is probably radeon module which i successfully installed but after some problems.. i remember that it failed on other modules but radeon seemed to go well... donno...
i agree, that i sounds like the problem is with your drivers. well, have you tried the "vesa" module ? it's very generic and works for my radeon on my notebook (though, of course, performance is not sufficient)
mfg.as.r IOhannes
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
really i am no longer on a laptop for linux (my vaio pooped), so i cannot comment on radeons but i am on 7.3 with 320MB ram 1.7GHz
glxgears -info is giving me
[root@localhost root]# glxgears -info GL_RENDERER = Mesa DRI Rage128 20010405 Pro AGP 1x x86/MMX/SSE GL_VERSION = 1.2 Mesa 3.4.2 GL_VENDOR = VA Linux Systems, Inc. GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_histogram GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_polygon_offset GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_MESA_window_pos GL_MESA_resize_buffers GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_PGI_misc_hints GL_SGIS_pixel_texture GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp 3191 frames in 5.0 seconds = 638.200 FPS 3197 frames in 5.0 seconds = 639.400 FPS 3197 frames in 5.0 seconds = 639.400 FPS 3134 frames in 5.0 seconds = 626.800 FPS 3150 frames in 5.0 seconds = 630.000 FPS 3149 frames in 5.0 seconds = 629.800 FPS 3150 frames in 5.0 seconds = 630.000 FPS 3135 frames in 5.0 seconds = 627.000 FPS
is this too slow? any ideas on the crashing GEM with the PLanet CCRMA .rpms? Where do i add the #include <string.h>
i would like a clean build of GEM for some work i would like to do
cheers~ Pat
kurt stockman wrote:
I experienced similar problems with an ATI radeon 7500. On debian i managed to overcome them by installing the xlibmesa3, xserver and xlibmesa-dev packages from http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/
- compiling radeon.o from the drm-trunk-module sources on that site (he has
them for i386 and ppc). But being a lousy hacker I screwed those up prety fast whilst upgrading some other stuff... + i never got the radeon TV-out to work (Gatos and others didn't work for me).
Now I'm on Redhat 8 with the Planet CCRMA packages and low latency kernel. I threw out the radeon and got me a relativly cheap nvidia 440 MX. Nvidia offers linux drivers on their site >> They were realy easy to compile + install (although the dl-ed kernel-package is compiled with 2.95, compiling the nvidia drivers and module with 3.2 worked just fine) and give me nice 3d support,tv-out and twinview (dual screen / 1 desktop >> pd-patch on my monitor + gemwin on the TV-out). info : http://www.sh.nu/nvidia/ And Gem didn't segfault since...
hope this helps someone,
kurt
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: pd-list-admin@iem.kug.ac.at [mailto:pd-list-admin@iem.kug.ac.at]Namens zmoelnig@iem.at Verzonden: zondag 19 januari 2003 9:45 Aan: marcell mars CC: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Onderwerp: Re: [PD] Gem failed after compiled against gcc 3.2 on GentooLinux
hi !
i think it is probably radeon module which i successfully installed but after some problems.. i remember that it failed on other modules but radeon seemed to go well... donno...
i agree, that i sounds like the problem is with your drivers. well, have you tried the "vesa" module ? it's very generic and works for my radeon on my notebook (though, of course, performance is not sufficient)
mfg.as.r IOhannes
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
kurt stockman -
marcell mars -
patrick pagano -
zmoelnig＠iem.at