hello,
is there a reason why not to use the normal PD distribution instead of guenter geiger's PDa on a IPAQ (Xscale)?
the familiar linux distribution says, that it is possible to use debian arm packages. as i don't have a IPAQ yet, I cannot test it.
Did somebody try to port PD to Pocket PC (Windows CE)?
I read:
is there a reason why not to use the normal PD distribution instead of guenter geiger's PDa on a IPAQ (Xscale)?
basically because the ipaq doesn't have a fpu and IIRC guenter's version is fixed point or 32bit int clean or whatever.
regards,
x
On Fri, 23 May 2003, CK wrote:
I read:
is there a reason why not to use the normal PD distribution instead of guenter geiger's PDa on a IPAQ (Xscale)?
basically because the ipaq doesn't have a fpu and IIRC guenter's version is fixed point or 32bit int clean or whatever.
True, using the arm floating point emulator you can not do sound processing. This means that you can do messages/control processing if you want to with the standard Debian arm package for example (theoretically).
Guenter
regards,
x
-- chris@lo-res.org Postmodernism is german romanticism with better http://pilot.fm/ special effects. (Jeff Keuss / via ctheory.com)
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
CK -
guenter geiger -
oliver thuns