You know what would be a really useful feature? A "set" method for [value], so that you can redefine which [value] you're tuned into, like the right inlet on the [array] objects.
Would other people use this? It seems to me that it would be easily implementable and would have no effect on backwards compatibility.
Liam
I always find additions to vanilla useful :)
maybe a design like [send], if it has no argument, then you have a 2nd inlet where you can set it
I suspect the problem sometimes is not being hard or easy to implement, but getting the design right and sure you're doing a nice thing.
cheers
2017-10-29 2:35 GMT-02:00 Liam Goodacre liamg_uw@hotmail.com:
You know what would be a really useful feature? A "set" method for [value], so that you can redefine which [value] you're tuned into, like the right inlet on the [array] objects.
Would other people use this? It seems to me that it would be easily implementable and would have no effect on backwards compatibility.
Liam
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong?
From: Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com Sent: 29 October 2017 05:19 To: Liam Goodacre Cc: PD list Subject: Re: [PD] A "set" method for [value]
I always find additions to vanilla useful :)
maybe a design like [send], if it has no argument, then you have a 2nd inlet where you can set it
I suspect the problem sometimes is not being hard or easy to implement, but getting the design right and sure you're doing a nice thing.
cheers
2017-10-29 2:35 GMT-02:00 Liam Goodacre <liamg_uw@hotmail.commailto:liamg_uw@hotmail.com>: You know what would be a really useful feature? A "set" method for [value], so that you can redefine which [value] you're tuned into, like the right inlet on the [array] objects.
Would other people use this? It seems to me that it would be easily implementable and would have no effect on backwards compatibility.
Liam
Pd-list@lists.iem.atmailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
2017-10-29 2:35 GMT-02:00 Liam Goodacre liamg_uw@hotmail.com:
You know what would be a really useful feature?
it has come up another feature that I'd find to be very useful too, which is for it to hold not only float values, but also symbols. Would other people also use this? :)
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Liam Goodacre