Hi All..
I have been using a very recent version of Gem (compiled: Mar 11 2011) for the pix_record to v4l2loopback feature (thanks Iohannes, It's working great!). But, the pdp2gem object is not working at all, while pix_2pdp works ok. (version "gem2pdp v0.7"). That's with pd vanilla (0.42-6)
If I use pd-extended (maverick stable), pdp2gem works ok, but only with the pre-compiled Gem version (compiled: Sep 22 2010). So, I 'm wondering if could be a new Gem compatibility issue, anyone can help me on that ?
Thanks in advance
On 04/05/2011 02:28 AM, Daniel Roviriego wrote:
Hi All..
I have been using a very recent version of Gem (compiled: Mar 11 2011) for the pix_record to v4l2loopback feature (thanks Iohannes, It's working great!). But, the pdp2gem object is not working at all, while pix_2pdp works ok. (version "gem2pdp v0.7"). That's with pd vanilla (0.42-6)
did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?
Gem has changed quite a lot in it's API, so things might have broken. the reason for the changes was, to allow for a more stable API in the future :-)
gfamsdr IOhannes
Hi.
*did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?*
Yes, I did. Should I try a more recent than the 11th March, svn ?
Thanks a lot
2011/4/5 IOhannes zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
On 04/05/2011 02:28 AM, Daniel Roviriego wrote:
Hi All..
I have been using a very recent version of Gem (compiled: Mar 11 2011) for the pix_record to v4l2loopback feature (thanks Iohannes, It's working great!). But, the pdp2gem object is not working at all, while pix_2pdp works ok. (version "gem2pdp v0.7"). That's with pd vanilla (0.42-6)
did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?
Gem has changed quite a lot in it's API, so things might have broken. the reason for the changes was, to allow for a more stable API in the future :-)
gfamsdr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-04-05 13:34, Daniel Roviriego wrote:
Hi.
*did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?*
Yes, I did. Should I try a more recent than the 11th March, svn ?
yes, try the one i just committed (rev15063) :-)
Hi IOannes
Have some time to test it now and remains the same situation. I just get a white gem screen, and pd does not drop me any errors...
thanks a lot.
d2
2011/4/7 IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-04-05 13:34, Daniel Roviriego wrote:
Hi.
*did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?*
Yes, I did. Should I try a more recent than the 11th March, svn ?
yes, try the one i just committed (rev15063) :-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2dePwACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvS+dwCgkT7v46vHE/MnRslO9pLhRyIi omwAn2li5TjN10y+0ri5GgAN1m2oylei =7tFr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Daniel Roviriego -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
IOhannes zmölnig