Hi all, I'm following this example (receiving a simple message)
https://flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch065_osc/
with processing. (using oscP5)
I'm sure processing code is right and working. I cannot recive anything in Pd instead. I set up the port number properly but Pd does not print out anything. Could anyone make this working?
thank you
P.
I have made this work many times. Make sure you have all the libraries loaded. Can you share your patch and sketch?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Giuseppe Peppino francesco.france@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all, I'm following this example (receiving a simple message)
https://flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch065_osc/
with processing. (using oscP5)
I'm sure processing code is right and working. I cannot recive anything in Pd instead. I set up the port number properly but Pd does not print out anything. Could anyone make this working?
thank you
P.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
yes, the pd patch is the one in the link I posted in the previous mail. The processing sketch I downloaded it from here and is the oscP5message.pde The only thing I changed is the port number (I set it equal both for pd and processing)
thank you
P.
From: gregpond@gmail.com Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:38:33 -0600 Subject: Re: [PD] Processing-OSC-Pd To: francesco.france@outlook.com CC: pd-list@iem.at
I have made this work many times. Make sure you have all the libraries loaded. Can you share your patch and sketch?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Giuseppe Peppino francesco.france@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all, I'm following this example (receiving a simple message)
https://flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch065_osc/
with processing. (using oscP5)
I'm sure processing code is right and working. I cannot recive anything in Pd instead. I set up the port number properly but Pd does not print out anything. Could anyone make this working?
thank you
P.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 2013-12-01 06:58, Peppe Peppino wrote:
Hi,
yes, the pd patch is the one in the link I posted in the previous mail. The processing sketch I downloaded it from here http://www.sojamo.de/libraries/oscP5/ and is the oscP5message.pde The only thing I changed is the port number (I set it equal both for pd and processing)
It works here without problem (both send and receive on localhost, 0.44-extended, host is Kubuntu 12.04). Maybe the port is already in use, but this would probably be reported in the console. Another reason could be that a firewall blocks the messages.
thank you
P.
Greetings & success,
Fred Jan
From: gregpond@gmail.com Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:38:33 -0600 Subject: Re: [PD] Processing-OSC-Pd To: francesco.france@outlook.com CC: pd-list@iem.at
I have made this work many times. Make sure you have all the libraries loaded. Can you share your patch and sketch?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Giuseppe Peppino francesco.france@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all, I'm following this example (receiving a simple message)
https://flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch065_osc/
with processing. (using oscP5)
I'm sure processing code is right and working. I cannot recive
anything in
Pd instead. I set up the port number properly but Pd does not print out anything. Could anyone make this working?
thank you
P.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi, well..that's weird..I have no idea why but now it's working perfectly..and I opened exactly the same files I had yesterday..thank you anyway :)
P.
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 10:54:33 +0100 From: fjkraan@xs4all.nl To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Processing-OSC-Pd
On 2013-12-01 06:58, Peppe Peppino wrote:
Hi,
yes, the pd patch is the one in the link I posted in the previous mail. The processing sketch I downloaded it from here http://www.sojamo.de/libraries/oscP5/ and is the oscP5message.pde The only thing I changed is the port number (I set it equal both for pd and processing)
It works here without problem (both send and receive on localhost, 0.44-extended, host is Kubuntu 12.04). Maybe the port is already in use, but this would probably be reported in the console. Another reason could be that a firewall blocks the messages.
thank you
P.
Greetings & success,
Fred Jan
From: gregpond@gmail.com Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:38:33 -0600 Subject: Re: [PD] Processing-OSC-Pd To: francesco.france@outlook.com CC: pd-list@iem.at
I have made this work many times. Make sure you have all the libraries loaded. Can you share your patch and sketch?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Giuseppe Peppino francesco.france@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all, I'm following this example (receiving a simple message)
https://flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch065_osc/
with processing. (using oscP5)
I'm sure processing code is right and working. I cannot recive
anything in
Pd instead. I set up the port number properly but Pd does not print out anything. Could anyone make this working?
thank you
P.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 2013-12-01 14:17, Peppe Peppino wrote:
Hi, well..that's weird..I have no idea why but now it's working perfectly..and I opened exactly the same files I had yesterday..thank you anyway :)
most likely you had another UDP-listener open at the same time (hint: e.g. a help-patch).
gmfsdr IOhannes
Hi, might be..but then I cannot have more than one listener at the same time? thanks
p.
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:31:05 +0100 From: zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Processing-OSC-Pd
On 2013-12-01 14:17, Peppe Peppino wrote:
Hi, well..that's weird..I have no idea why but now it's working perfectly..and I opened exactly the same files I had yesterday..thank you anyway :)
most likely you had another UDP-listener open at the same time (hint: e.g. a help-patch).
gmfsdr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 2013-12-01 15:54, Peppe Peppino wrote:
Hi, might be..but then I cannot have more than one listener at the same time?
not when using the same protocol (e.g. UDP) on the same port (e.g. 9999) on the same network interface (which you can simplify to "single computer").
this is how the internet works (and is unrelated to Pd).
gfmdsar IOhannes
-
Fred Jan Kraan -
Giuseppe Peppino -
Greg Pond -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Peppe Peppino