I'm pretty new to audio under linux, but installed Agnula including pd and alsa and the low-latency kernel. For now I starting out slow by focusing on audio and leaving midi for later... But I have some problems:
I run pd with "pd -alsa -nomidi" but get:
Sample width set to 2 bytes snd_pcm_hw_params_set_format (output): Invalid argument
The test tone generated by pd under "Test Audio and MIDI" sounds very distorted. and the peaks under out are showing 60 and 80 (under -40 and -20).
Another interresting (?) thing is that before running pd xmms works (with the "ALSA 0.9 output plugin [libALSA.so]" Output Plugin), but after having run pd xmms simply freezes (not crashes or dies, the time just stays on 00:00) and doesn't play anything.
Any clues or pointers? Are there any known issues with pd/alsa/agnula? I tried google but the only thing I could find was someone having a similar problem on an ibook...
Another question: When I get things going I dream about buying a PIV 2400 laptop for running pd and/or csound (not going to run any seqencers or the like live, simply softsynths controlled by midi controlers) for live performance. How well can I expect this to perform in terms of polyphony and latency with average complicated patches?
peace, love & harmony Atte
Hallo, Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote:
I'm pretty new to audio under linux, but installed Agnula including pd and alsa and the low-latency kernel. For now I starting out slow by focusing on audio and leaving midi for later... But I have some problems:
I run pd with "pd -alsa -nomidi" but get:
Sample width set to 2 bytes snd_pcm_hw_params_set_format (output): Invalid argument
Does Pd run better using the OSS emulation ("pd -oss")? What card do you have and which version number of Pd are you running?
Another question: When I get things going I dream about buying a PIV 2400 laptop for running pd and/or csound (not going to run any seqencers or the like live, simply softsynths controlled by midi controlers) for live performance. How well can I expect this to perform in terms of polyphony and latency with average complicated patches?
It'll run fast as h*ll. I only have a Mobile Celeron 1.3 and I can run most things I build very good.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:02:38 +0200 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
I run pd with "pd -alsa -nomidi" but get:
Sample width set to 2 bytes snd_pcm_hw_params_set_format (output): Invalid argument
Does Pd run better using the OSS emulation ("pd -oss")?
I don't seem to have that option... My pd is the one from demudi, I know they focus hard on alsa, maybe they complied without support for oss?
What card do you have and which version number of Pd are you running?
My card is AWE64gold and my pd is version "0.36 preliminary test 5"...
Any idea what exactly is causing the "snd_pcm_hw_params_set_format (output): Invalid argument" error? pd? alsa?
<snip>I dream about buying a PIV 2400 laptop for running pd <snip> How well can I expect this to perform <snip>
It'll run fast as h*ll. I only have a Mobile Celeron 1.3 and I can run most things I build very good.
Wow, I'll be looking forward to that!