hello list,
I am using |vcf~| inside granular synthesis and granulator patches and I have two questions related to it
When you set Q to zero (rightmost inlet), this somehow bypasses the filter because the bandwidth is very wide; is it correct to do this ? Or should I rather make a traditional bypass circuit ?
anything serious for compensating the volume loss it would be great; I'm sure it's possible, as there is a bandpass filter that does this in Max/MSP (see the help file of |filtergraph| or |filtercoef|). In the context of granular synthesis and microsound, it's of course impossible to use |env~| ...
thanks a lot, -j
Hallo, julien.breval@tremplin-utc.net hat gesagt: // julien.breval@tremplin-utc.net wrote:
- bypassing
When you set Q to zero (rightmost inlet), this somehow bypasses the filter because the bandwidth is very wide; is it correct to do this ? Or should I rather make a traditional bypass circuit ?
I'd make a real bypass.
You can save some CPU cycles, if you bypass it completly using for example a subpatch and [switch~]. Sending 0/1 to [switch~] inside a subpatch will dis/enable this subpatch. You could also add a little [$1 10(---[line~] ramp and delay the message to switch~ by 10msec to avoid clicks.
Depending on your patch in granular synthesis the saved CPU cycles can add up quite a bit and allow more grains.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: fqdn _ http://footils.org/cms/show/38