I’d follow up with a request for [closebang] in vanilla as well.

Dan Wilcox @danomatika https://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/

On Jul 5, 2015, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

From: Alexandros Drymonitis <adrcki@gmail.com mailto:adrcki@gmail.com> Subject: [PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang] Date: July 5, 2015 at 5:56:29 AM EDT To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>

I've made an abstraction with an arbitrary number of inlets, and in extended you can save it in a patch as its connections will be maintained (using [initbang] to create the inlets), but in vanilla it's not possible cause I'm using [loadbang] and Pd fails to make the connections (as the inlets are being created after the patch has been loaded).

Is there a way to achieve the [initbang] effect in vanilla? Or is there any intention to include [initbang] in a future vanilla release?

Also, can't seem to find any initbang.c or initbang.pd_darwin. I guess it's in a file that contains more classes and is called something else. Is there a way to find a binary or code to compile, so I can use [initbang] in vanilla on os x?