hi
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short time and i want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward. any ideas how i could do that?
yours
NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once. http://datingsearch.lycos.com
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short time and i want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward. any ideas how i could do that?
speedlim?
t
Hallo, Dieter Untermieter hat gesagt: // Dieter Untermieter wrote:
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short time and i want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward. any ideas how i could do that?
You can let the first bang close a [spigot] cross-connected after itself and then open it again after a certain time using a [del XXX] object.
See attached abstraction: working class [speedlim].
(If you replace the 1000 with $1 and add in/outlets you can use this as a speedlim abstraction.)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "scans" _ http://footils.org/cms/show/41
hi
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short time and
i want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward.
any ideas how i could do that?
Hi!
I would bang into a [toggle] and afterwards [select 0]. If I get you right..
cheers, geadsch
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
geadsch wrote:
hi
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short time and
i want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward.
any ideas how i could do that?
Hi!
I would bang into a [toggle] and afterwards [select 0]. If I get you right..
this will only work is you are absolutely sure, that you will get 2 bangs instead of one. furthermore, i would not use a graphical object like [tgl], but rather build a toggle myself (a "% 2" counter )
apart from that, what is wrong with using [del] ? drawback: [del] will only output a however short period _after_ the last (in your case: 2nd) bang. if you are getting a series of 1000s of bangs, the [del] will wait until the last one came in and afterwards send its bang. however, in most cases this behaviour is sufficient.
mfg..adsr IOhannes
You could use a [oneshot] in combo with the [delay] to make it output after a set delay, no matter how many bangs it received (see attached).
.hc
On Apr 29, 2005, at 5:21 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
geadsch wrote:
hi
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short
time andi want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward.
any ideas how i could do that?
Hi!
I would bang into a [toggle] and afterwards [select 0]. If I get you right..
this will only work is you are absolutely sure, that you will get 2 bangs instead of one. furthermore, i would not use a graphical object like [tgl], but rather build a toggle myself (a "% 2" counter )
apart from that, what is wrong with using [del] ? drawback: [del] will only output a however short period _after_ the
last (in your case: 2nd) bang. if you are getting a series of 1000s of
bangs, the [del] will wait until the last one came in and afterwards send its
bang. however, in most cases this behaviour is sufficient.mfg..adsr IOhannes
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"The arc of history bends towards justice."
Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
oops, I included a bad [oneshot], this one follows the Gem version's syntax.
.hc
On Apr 29, 2005, at 5:21 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
geadsch wrote:
hi
i am having a special problem. i get two bang within a very short
time andi want to "collect" them and send only one bang forward.
any ideas how i could do that?
Hi!
I would bang into a [toggle] and afterwards [select 0]. If I get you right..
this will only work is you are absolutely sure, that you will get 2 bangs instead of one. furthermore, i would not use a graphical object like [tgl], but rather build a toggle myself (a "% 2" counter )
apart from that, what is wrong with using [del] ? drawback: [del] will only output a however short period _after_ the
last (in your case: 2nd) bang. if you are getting a series of 1000s of
bangs, the [del] will wait until the last one came in and afterwards send its
bang. however, in most cases this behaviour is sufficient.mfg..adsr IOhannes
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -David Zicarelli
-
Dieter Untermieter -
Frank Barknecht -
geadsch -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Tim Blechmann