how come pd dsp is set to 0 as default? i know it's not hard to do a [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
but, wouldn't it make sense to turn dsp on by default???
Hallo, hard off hat gesagt: // hard off wrote:
how come pd dsp is set to 0 as default? i know it's not hard to do a [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
but, wouldn't it make sense to turn dsp on by default???
Then you'd need to do [loadbang]-[; pd dsp 0( if you don't want sound immediatly. What's the advantage of that? ;)
I prefer to have a silent Pd on startup. It might be, that sound levels in a patch are much higher than what I prefer, so I normally turn down the volume (when I've found the respective slider) then turn on dsp, then slowly turn up the volume.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
I've finally learned the shortcut keys on Windows so I can switch on and off without the DSP message or the mouse. As I understand it, one of the reasons for allowing audio to be turned on and off is that there are times you don't need it, and it takes up CPU. Makes sense to me.
A flag to set DSP to 1 would be nice though. I thought there was one, but I don't see it. Should we put in a feature request?
-Chuckk
On 5/25/06, hard off hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
A flag to set DSP to 1 would be nice though. I thought there was one, but I don't see it. Should we put in a feature request?
From the command line:
pd -send "; pd dsp 1"
I use -send a quite a bit to set audio settings because the proper flags don't seem to work (always get 0 (and disabled) channels with -jack in pd-0.39-2).
I use [r pd]--[print] to see what messages the audio dialogs send, then replicate them on the command line with pd -send "; pd ...".
But having said that, I don't often want DSP activated on start-up, for the reasons that Frank mentioned.
Claude
-Chuckk
On 5/25/06, hard off wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
I agree. With a premade, strictly audio app like Cakewalk or Digital Performer, it makes sense for audio to be on, but in Pd you have to build or load a program to do anything anyway. But having the option is cool.
I can't get any form of -send "; pd dsp 1" to work from the registry flags. What other messages might I put as arguments for "-send" to test it?
On 5/25/06, Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaximus@goto10.org wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
A flag to set DSP to 1 would be nice though. I thought there was one, but I don't see it. Should we put in a feature request?
From the command line:
pd -send "; pd dsp 1"
I use -send a quite a bit to set audio settings because the proper flags don't seem to work (always get 0 (and disabled) channels with -jack in pd-0.39-2).
I use [r pd]--[print] to see what messages the audio dialogs send, then replicate them on the command line with pd -send "; pd ...".
But having said that, I don't often want DSP activated on start-up, for the reasons that Frank mentioned.
Claude
-Chuckk
On 5/25/06, hard off wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
[loadbang] | [; pd dsp 1(
.hc
On May 25, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I agree. With a premade, strictly audio app like Cakewalk or Digital Performer, it makes sense for audio to be on, but in Pd you have to build or load a program to do anything anyway. But having the option is cool.
I can't get any form of -send "; pd dsp 1" to work from the registry flags. What other messages might I put as arguments for "-send" to test it?
On 5/25/06, Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaximus@goto10.org wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
A flag to set DSP to 1 would be nice though. I thought there
was one,
but I don't see it. Should we put in a feature request?
From the command line:
pd -send "; pd dsp 1"
I use -send a quite a bit to set audio settings because the proper
flags don't seem to work (always get 0 (and disabled) channels with - jack in pd-0.39-2).I use [r pd]--[print] to see what messages the audio dialogs send,
then replicate them on the command line with pd -send "; pd ...".But having said that, I don't often want DSP activated on start- up, for the reasons that Frank mentioned.
Claude
-Chuckk
On 5/25/06, hard off wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
-- "Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." -Theodore Roosevelt
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a
more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in
practice, it can change entire economies."
- Amy Smith
greetings list
ive always thought the DSP turned of was proper because everyone is working with different processing powers , its easy to make a computer completely grind to a halt with large works in PD , depending on your processing power . the large number of people who use PD for visuals may not even need it on at all .
isn't it just a matter of hacking Pd's tk files to load with DSP on ?
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
That is the main reason JJ, when you've built a patch and made a terrible mistake so it crashes every time you load it, having dsp 0 by default seems entirely sensible. You can also disable all loadbangs and a few other things on launch to help you debug
-noloadbang -nogui -nomidi -nodac -noadc
all these have been useful to me at one time.
Thu, 25 May 2006 08:03:45 -0700 (PDT) J_J_FUX j_j_fux@yahoo.com wrote:
greetings list
ive always thought the DSP turned of was proper because everyone is working with different processing powers , its easy to make a computer completely grind to a halt with large works in PD , depending on your processing power . the large number of people who use PD for visuals may not even need it on at all .
isn't it just a matter of hacking Pd's tk files to load with DSP on ?
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
so, are you all saying that pd does interesting things apart from signal processing?
ok, ok, i get your point ;)
thanks for the tip claude, will try that out now.
hi hardoff
i disagree with you...
roman
"hard off" hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
I disagree with both of you.
On 5/25/06, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
hi hardoff
i disagree with you...
roman
"hard off" hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Chuckk Hubbard" badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree with both of you.
hehe
On 5/25/06, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
hi hardoff
i disagree with you...
roman
"hard off" hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
i disagree
i think 80% of pd users do [loadbang] [; pd dsp 1<
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
-
Chuckk Hubbard -
Claude Heiland-Allen -
Frank Barknecht -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
hard off -
J_J_FUX -
padawan12 -
Roman Haefeli