Hi all, I am new to this mailing list, so pleased to meet you!
I have been thinking about this question since a while: is it possible to say that Pd is more efficient than Max? In one hand is pretty obvious that Max requires more space for documentation and all the externals and whathever, but does this lead more latency and more cpu-wasting when it comes to audio synthesis? I also did not have the possibility to test Max in an old PC.
Plus, -if there is a newbie-friendly possible answer- in which ways do the overall architectures of the two programs diverge? I am not talking about the obvious differencies about the two programs which can be easily found on the Internet. I am also sorry if this question was already asked, but I did not found any thread about it (and it is possible that I searched wrong!).
Thanks a lot
Em ter., 14 de jan. de 2020 às 14:50, Giovanni gionogio@gmail.com escreveu:
Hi all, I am new to this mailing list, so pleased to meet you!
I have been thinking about this question since a while: is it possible to say that Pd is more efficient than Max? In one hand is pretty obvious that Max requires more space for documentation and all the externals and whathever,
Max doesn't come with externals, unless you mean Gen~ / Jitter / etc, as far as documentation goes, it shouldn't take much space. But yeah, comparing the size of Max and Pd is ridiculous. And in this sense, I consider Pd to be much lighter. Pd runs in quite old computers and on things like raspberry pi, I don't believe Max could run on a raspberry if it could be installed in Linux, for instance.