How about abstractions contributed from the community? (something nicely searchable like PDB)

B.

----- Original Message ----- From: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org Date: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:48 pm Subject: [PD] what pure-data.org needs to have

Here's a quick list I just compiled of what all the new pure- data.org could have:

"getting help" docs tutorials FAQ dev section howto join SF CVS various devs and their projects downloads pd packages pd-externals, etc. from SF CVS other pd packages/externals forums the pd-list in forums format could be helpful to people who are hesitant to subscribe to the list. blog a good outlet for related news, events postings, etc. wiki site for building local user group pages. patch exchange

Now there is definitely some overlap, so I think we need at least to have a vague definition of what each section is supposed to do rather than just put up everything and the kitchen sink just because we can.
That would lead to pure-data.org becoming just as fragmented as the current layout across many sites.

Did I miss anything?

.hc

---

PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list