Hello list,
I realised, that the [table] object wont save the Y values that I set through the properties menu. Is this a bug?
cheers
Just like [array define], [table] is specifically meant for cases where you don't need/want the visual representation of the underlying data. Otherwise just use a regular graphical array.
Christof
On 20.05.2020 19:43, José Rafael Subía Valdez wrote:
Hello list,
I realised, that the [table] object wont save the Y values that I set through the properties menu. Is this a bug?
cheers
-- José Rafael Subía Valdez www.jrsv.net http://www.jrsv.net
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 5/20/20 7:43 PM, José Rafael Subía Valdez wrote:
Hello list,
I realised, that the [table] object wont save the Y values that I set through the properties menu. Is this a bug?
i don't think so.
this is of course arguable, but for me [table] is simply a storage that happens to allow you to inspect the data in a graphical way- but the primary purpose is to just store these numbers. the actual representation is of secondary concern to [table].
however, if your primary intention is to display the data, use *graphs* insteads.
gmdsar IOhannes
Em qua., 20 de mai. de 2020 às 15:13, José Rafael Subía Valdez < jsubiavaldez@gmail.com> escreveu:
Hello list,
I realised, that the [table] object wont save the Y values that I set through the properties menu. Is this a bug?
no, but it could be a feature to request, or its documentation could just mention this... but the thing is, the [table] object is old and has a better new alternative, the [array] object, which has this functionality already, use the "-k" (for "keep" I guess?) in [array define] to keep its values saved in the patch.
Em qui., 21 de mai. de 2020 às 01:12, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
or its documentation could just mention this...
as it turns out, I have made some changes to the help file, which have been merged already, and I do explicitly mention this information, that it doesn't keep values... but I could also mention how you can do it with [array] instead...
Thanks guys, I was trying things out and I ran into this, so I asked. I ended up using just the array graph.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:17 PM Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
Em qui., 21 de mai. de 2020 às 01:16, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
as it turns out, I have made some changes to the help file, which have been merged already,
just to be clear, it's not in Pd 0.52, it's coming up in the next version only
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Christof Ressi -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
José Rafael Subía Valdez