Forgot to copy list...
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly inconsistent behaviors...
Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now.
Roman
I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it.
cheers
2017-10-03 6:59 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli reduzent@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly inconsistent behaviors...
Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now.
Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it.
That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to implement. (I believe DesireData had it.)
I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction. -Jonathan
cheers
2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com:
I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction.
This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I?
cheers
So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData?
On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com:
I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction.
This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I?
cheers
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData?
Not sure at whom that is directed, but I'm definitely not saying that.
Post a trivial example patch on the tracker and I'll have a look and see if I can fix it: https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/issues -Jonathan
On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com:
I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction.
This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I? cheers ______________________________ _________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
On 10/03/2017 07:08 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to implement. (I believe DesireData had it.)
Pd has it as well: https://git.iem.at/pd-gui/punish
gfmrdsa IOhannes
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Esa Ruoho -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Ivica Bukvic -
Jonathan Wilkes -
Roman Haefeli