Actually, it isn't his call :-) GEM has the gpl...
BTW, I think that the layer is _very_ cool!
Later, Mark
============================== = mdanks@stormfront.com = Technical Director PS2/XBox = http://www.danks.org/mark ==============================
-----Original Message----- From: smoerk [mailto:smoerk@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:05 PM To: Pd-List Subject: Re: [PD] [announce] Max-PD C++ compatibility layer v 0.1 / xsample objects v0.2
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:27:07 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi list, here is a first version of the Max-PD C++ compatibility
layer for PD and Max
externals.
i would prefer a license like bsd or the pd license. nothing against gpl, but for such a general thing, it would be better to have a license, which gives the author of a new external the freedom to choose a license for it. (yes, i know, i don't have to use your layer and it's your decission, but ... it would make me happier ;)
the comments in the files say it's his work:
Copyright (c) 2001,2002 Thomas Grill (xovo@gmx.net) For information on usage and redistribution, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES, see the file, "license.txt," in this distribution.
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:15:33 -0800, Mark Danks wrote:
Actually, it isn't his call :-) GEM has the gpl...
BTW, I think that the layer is _very_ cool!
smoerk wrote:
the comments in the files say it's his work:
and it does say, it uses large parts of code from GEM:
<quote> This package uses a lot of code from GEM by Mark Danks and also some snippets from the PD distribution by Miller Puckette.
See the license texts below:
</quote>
mfg.casd.sdr IOhannes
somehow i start starting flame-wars (on ALSA, GPL,...) don't know why...
am 13.02.2002 1:05 Uhr schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig unter zmoelnig@iem.kug.ac.at:
smoerk wrote:
the comments in the files say it's his work:
and it does say, it uses large parts of code from GEM:
<quote> This package uses a lot of code from GEM by Mark Danks and also some snippets from the PD distribution by Miller Puckette.
See the license texts below:
</quote>
Hi list, honestly, i simply chose the GPL because Mark Danks did it and because i didn't want to spend much time dealing with that legal stuff. As i see it (and read it in the gpl.txt file), the GPL grants you the freedom to do with the code what you want, and also change and redistribute it as long as you state what the sources are and as long as you make the source code available to the public again. This is just my intention: as i learned a lot of things out of the open sources from pd, GEM and other packages, other people should be given that opportunity as well. If there is any further problem please let me know. Please also tell me if there is any problem with the name "max-pd" (i didn't ask David Zicarelli yet....)
and.... bug reports please! (max-pd and xsample)
greetings, Thomas