hello again,
catching up after vacation I finally got into checking .34test4... It looks _very_ promising. But how is it possible that nobody on this list has ever complained over obvious glitches in pd.tk and makefile.in which, although minor omissions from coder's pov, make user's life rather hard...
Two attached diffs contain most obvious corrections.
Krzysztof
--- ../src/u_main.tk Sun Aug 5 03:42:10 2001 +++ pd.tk Fri Aug 17 18:41:58 2001 @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ pd [concat $name graph ;] }
-proc menu_array {name accel} { +proc menu_array {name} { pd [concat $name array ;] }
@@ -694,6 +694,23 @@
$name.m.put.m add cascade -label "IO-lets" \
-menu $name.m.put.m.subm
+menu $name.m.put.m.subm
$name.m.put.m.subm add command -label "Control inlet" \
-command [concat menu_cinlet $name 0] \
-accelerator "Alt+1"
$name.m.put.m.subm add command -label "Signal inlet" \
-command [concat menu_sinlet $name 0] \
-accelerator "Alt+2"
$name.m.put.m.subm add command -label "Control outlet" \
-command [concat menu_coutlet $name 0] \
-accelerator "Alt+3"
$name.m.put.m.subm add command -label "Signal outlet" \
-command [concat menu_soutlet $name 0] \
-accelerator "Alt+4"
$name.m.put.m add command -label Graph
-command [concat menu_graph $name]
@@ -1211,8 +1228,8 @@ set var_graph_ypix [concat graph_ypix_$vid] global $var_graph_ypix
+# puts stderr $var_graph_x2
+# puts stderr [eval concat $$var_graph_x2]
pd [concat $id dialog
[eval concat $$var_graph_x1]
[eval concat $$var_graph_y1] \
--- makefile.in~ Fri Aug 3 23:44:14 2001 +++ makefile.in Fri Aug 17 18:52:42 2001 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
SYSSRC = s_linux.c s_linux_midiparse.c s_linux_midi_io.c
-SRC = g_canvas.c g_graph.c g_text.c g_rtext.c g_array.c g_template.c g_io.c
+SRC = g_canvas.c g_graph.c g_text.c g_rtext.c g_array.c g_template.c g_io_gui.c
g_scalar.c g_traversal.c g_guiconnect.c
g_7_guis.c g_bng.c g_hslider.c g_radiobut.c g_toggle.c g_uni_canvas.c
g_vslider.c g_vu.c \
On 8/17/01 1:43 PM, "Krzysztof Czaja" czaja@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
hello again,
catching up after vacation I finally got into checking .34test4... It looks _very_ promising. But how is it possible that nobody on this list has ever complained over obvious glitches in pd.tk and makefile.in which, although minor omissions from coder's pov, make user's life rather hard...
hehe, because either everyone is on vacation (low traffic proves it, even integer seems to be floating somewhere else) or everyone is busy doing stuff and forgot about the new test release (this is my case - got stuck in .33patch1).
So, am I missing something important?
./MiS
OK, thanks Krzysztof, I've gone and put out a "0.34 test 5" containing your bug fixes (and some of my own.)
One point of confusion... I didn't want to include the "graphical inlets" and outlets because I think it's more correct to have them as text objects (plus, that's the way the Max import/export function wants them)...
cheers Miller
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:00:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
hi,
Michal Seta wrote: ...
and forgot about the new test release (this is my case - got stuck in .33patch1).
So, am I missing something important?
...
the basic gui objects are now (being) patched from iemgui into Pd core.
K.