Hi list,
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
Thanks,
Matthew
[pack 0 0] | [line]
is what you are after.
The control data goes in the left inlet of pack, and on the right is the amount of interpolation in ms. See the help file for [line] for more info. You can also use [line~] for controlling audio objects.
d.
matthew venn wrote:
Hi list,
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
I think [mavg] from the zexy library does what you want. zexy is included with Pd-extended. If you are on Linux another easy way to get it might be through your package manager (depending on which distro you use).
Jamie
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
hello,
i did not see the original question. the mapping lib have a lot's of diferents kind of data filter. have a look at iir, fir and median_n objects.
if you wish to use line, then have also a look at line3.
cyrille
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
By the way, the mapping lib is included in Pd-extended. Check out
Help -> Browser -> 5.reference -> mapping.
.hc
On Feb 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
i did not see the original question. the mapping lib have a lot's of diferents kind of data filter. have a look at iir, fir and median_n objects.
if you wish to use line, then have also a look at line3.
cyrille
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did
now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction
using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really
necessary to go into the audio domain.I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch
somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http:// messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
[smooth] in pixelTANGO does just lop in message domain, written by Thomas Grill. Should just work in pd extended...
.b.
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Feb 11, 2008 1:24 PM, B. Bogart ben@ekran.org wrote:
[smooth] in pixelTANGO does just lop in message domain, written by Thomas Grill. Should just work in pd extended...
That's incorrect, [smooth] makes use of audio domain. The one by TG from 2003, anyways, perhaps there is another version of which I am not aware.
./MiS
sorry, forgot to attach the patch
roman
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:41 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
thanks everyone, I'm using [line] and it works just how I want it!
Matthew
On 12/02/2008, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
sorry, forgot to attach the patch
roman
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:41 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in equal amounts!
yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain.
I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as it seems to me like quite a useful function.
definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->