hi,
i noticed that the forward object seems broken with pd 0.37, too bad, i needed it or i'll try to do it with send13 ..
hum, i might be wong too bryan, maybe my setup is wrong but i don't think so.
cheers, sevy
hi Yves, hi list,
On 15 August 2003 at 03:25:52, Yves Degoyon wrote:
hi,
i noticed that the forward object seems broken with pd 0.37, too bad, i needed it or i'll try to do it with send13 ..
i just compiled with:
using:
and things seemed to work fine, at least in the help patch.
hum, i might be wong too bryan, maybe my setup is wrong but i don't think so.
what kind of symptoms are you getting exactly?
marmosets, Bryan
hi,
hum, i was using forward v0.01, which used to be ok with pd-0.36 and is now broken with 0.37. ( the symptom was that it didn't send anything at all ).
ok, sprinkler v0.04 works... ( that's what on the site, despite announced as 0.03 )
thanx, sevy
Bryan Jurish wrote:
hi Yves, hi list,
On 15 August 2003 at 03:25:52, Yves Degoyon wrote:
hi,
i noticed that the forward object seems broken with pd 0.37, too bad, i needed it or i'll try to do it with send13 ..
i just compiled with:
- gcc v2.95.4 (debian "woody")
- sprinkler v0.04 (CVS)
- Also available at: http://www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/~moocow/projects/pd
- no code changes from v0.03
using:
- ./configure --with-pd-dir=../pd-0.37-test8 --enable-forward
and things seemed to work fine, at least in the help patch.
hum, i might be wong too bryan, maybe my setup is wrong but i don't think so.
what kind of symptoms are you getting exactly?
marmosets, Bryan