Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there is a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?
Enrique
Rename the .d_fat to pd_darwin and it'll work.
.hc
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:46 PM, enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there is
a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?Enrique _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there is a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?
what you are doing wrong is not reading the READMEs that come with the package.
apart from that, hans has already given the answer.
fgmasdr IOhannes
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:24 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there is a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?
what you are doing wrong is not reading the READMEs that come with the package.
apart from that, hans has already given the answer.
How about distributing Gem as Gem.pd_darwin? Then it will just work
everywhere.
.hc
I hate it when they say, "He gave his life for his country." Nobody
gives their life for anything. We steal the lives of these kids. -
Admiral Gene LeRocque
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:24 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I canŽt find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there is a Gem.d_fat but it doesnŽt work..or am I doing something wrong?
what you are doing wrong is not reading the READMEs that come with the package.
apart from that, hans has already given the answer.
How about distributing Gem as Gem.pd_darwin? Then it will just work everywhere.
How about fixing pd-extended to support at least as many features as pd?
Otherwise the 'extended' is a bit of a misnomer :)
.hc
On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:24 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there
is a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?what you are doing wrong is not reading the READMEs that come with
the package.apart from that, hans has already given the answer.
How about distributing Gem as Gem.pd_darwin? Then it will just
work everywhere.How about fixing pd-extended to support at least as many features as
pd?Otherwise the 'extended' is a bit of a misnomer :)
That's the point. .d_fat is _definitely_ not a feature. It is a
kludge that solves no problems, and only causes them.
.hc
All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne
On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:24 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
enrique franco wrote:
Hi,
I can´t find the Gem.pd_darwin with the OSX distribution...there
is a Gem.d_fat but it doesn´t work..or am I doing something wrong?what you are doing wrong is not reading the READMEs that come
with the package.apart from that, hans has already given the answer.
How about distributing Gem as Gem.pd_darwin? Then it will just
work everywhere.How about fixing pd-extended to support at least as many features
as pd?Otherwise the 'extended' is a bit of a misnomer :)
That's the point. .d_fat is _definitely_ not a feature. It is a
kludge that solves no problems, and only causes them.
I forgot to mention, that's not to say I wouldn't mind someone fixing
this. Patches welcome!
.hc
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
-
Claude Heiland-Allen -
enrique franco -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig