I updated the earplug~ external to build using pd-lin-builder, so it should be easy to build on Windows:
https://github.com/pd-externals/earplug/tree/main https://github.com/pd-externals/earplug/tree/main
It's not the best but we use it for a project at work. It can use some additional optimizations and the dataset is for 44.1k so you are in luck. For our project, we are likely to introduce resampling for other sample rates so it's more accurate beyond 44.1k...
On Jun 2, 2021, at 12:06 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:12:23 +0100 From: Jo?o Pais <jmmmpais@gmail.com mailto:jmmmpais@gmail.com> To: PD-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> Subject: [PD] Binaural w32? Message-ID: <ef02d682-c394-1622-2787-a7de210f1d75@gmail.com mailto:ef02d682-c394-1622-2787-a7de210f1d75@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi list,
what is the current state of the art in binaural externals? I see in the archives that there are several around, each with advantages/disadvantages.
I would need it to:
windows 32b
record the output of an already existing patch with x-y
coordinates/trajectories into binaural audio
sample rate fixed at 44.1KHz
there are around 500 samples with an individual player, so each will
need its own enconder. They don't play necessarily all together, though.
Best,
Joao
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
that is nice - although I can't really build anything in windows on my own. what are the improvements compared to the 2009 version?
I updated the earplug~ external to build using pd-lin-builder, so it should be easy to build on Windows:
https://github.com/pd-externals/earplug/tree/main https://github.com/pd-externals/earplug/tree/main
It's not the best but we use it for a project at work. It can use some additional optimizations and the dataset is for 44.1k so you are in luck. For our project, we are likely to introduce resampling for other sample rates so it's more accurate beyond 44.1k...