howdy, so I finally tried installing pd vanilla on my C.H.I.P.
tried apt-get install puredata and got Pd 0.46
where's 0.47?
it's a debian package and an ARM architecture, so, can you install 0.47 in C.H.I.P.? Anyone did it?
sorry I'm really dumb on this, never really messed with linux or anything
cheers
howdy, so I finally tried installing pd vanilla on my C.H.I.P.
Congratulations! But what is a C.H.I.P.?
tried apt-get install puredata and got Pd 0.46
where's 0.47?
$ aptitude versions puredata
or search https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
which might show you the available versions. If this is a Debian system you would have to use the "testing" version of the package. Perhaps see https://serverfault.com/questions/22414/how-can-i-run-debian-stable-but-inst... (unverified)
it's a debian package and an ARM architecture, so, can you install 0.47 in C.H.I.P.? Anyone did it?
sorry I'm really dumb on this, never really messed with linux or anything
Don't worry, you are almost there™
Peter
as previously answered by IOhannes :
On 2016-10-25 03:12, Peter Nyboer wrote:
Is 47 available via apt, or is 46 the latest I can get through this method?
certainly Pd-0.47 is available via the official Debian apt repositories.
but Debian/jessie (aka stable) has been released 2015-04, when the current Pd version was 0.46. so in order to use the 0.47 packages, you need to do a system upgrade to stretch (currently testing).
you *might* have luck with manually downloading/installing the stretch packages¹ on your jessie system (totally untested; also, i would *not* recommend adding stretch to your apt-sources, as the entire C++ stack has changed and you might just blow your system).
fgamsdr IOhannes
PS: and not to forget: i have posted instructions to this list numerous times, how to build your own debs (based on the original Debian packages) for your odd system (e.g. raspberries running jessie) - which happens to also work in your case!
btw, I'm curious about the result
++ b
On 02/11/2016 18:23, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
howdy, so I finally tried installing pd vanilla on my C.H.I.P.
tried apt-get install puredata and got Pd 0.46
where's 0.47?
it's a debian package and an ARM architecture, so, can you install 0.47 in C.H.I.P.? Anyone did it?
sorry I'm really dumb on this, never really messed with linux or anything
cheers
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I've had the same issue on RPi. I'm no backend Linux guy either but it seems problematic for Pd's available current version to be tied to an OS release. Is there some way around this?
On Thursday, 3 November 2016, Benjamin ~ b01 benjah@free.fr wrote:
as previously answered by IOhannes :
On 2016-10-25 03:12, Peter Nyboer wrote:
Is 47 available via apt, or is 46 the latest I can get through this method?
certainly Pd-0.47 is available via the official Debian apt repositories.
but Debian/jessie (aka stable) has been released 2015-04, when the current Pd version was 0.46. so in order to use the 0.47 packages, you need to do a system upgrade to stretch (currently testing).
you **might** have luck with manually downloading/installing the stretch packages¹ on your jessie system (totally untested; also, i would **not** recommend adding stretch to your apt-sources, as the entire C++ stack has changed and you might just blow your system).
fgamsdr IOhannes
PS: and not to forget: i have posted instructions to this list numerous times, how to build your own debs (based on the original Debian packages) for your odd system (e.g. raspberries running jessie) - which happens to also work in your case!
¹ https://packages.debian.org/stretch/puredata
btw, I'm curious about the result
++ b
On 02/11/2016 18:23, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
howdy, so I finally tried installing pd vanilla on my C.H.I.P.
tried apt-get install puredata and got Pd 0.46
where's 0.47?
it's a debian package and an ARM architecture, so, can you install 0.47 in C.H.I.P.? Anyone did it?
sorry I'm really dumb on this, never really messed with linux or anything
cheers
_______________________________________________Pd-list@lists.iem.at javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Pd-list@lists.iem.at'); mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 11/02/2016 09:57 PM, Richie Cyngler wrote:
I've had the same issue on RPi. I'm no backend Linux guy either but it seems problematic for Pd's available current version to be tied to an OS release.
why is this problematic?
the entire point of a distribution (which is a more accurate term than "OS"), is to ensure that all the components play together *nicely*. this works suprisingly well, given that Debian/stable (the one with Pd-0.46) has about 57000 software packages, that *all* play together nicely.
Is there some way around this?
it occurs to me, that i have posted one a number of times.
anyhow, I'm planning to provide backports once Debian/stretch has been released.
fgmrdsa IOhannes
Your reasoning makes sense to me IOhannes. My thinking was that it would be good to be able to install newer versions of Pd independently of the OS distribution it's running on. I see that they are not entirely independent from each other though.
On Thursday, 3 November 2016, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 11/02/2016 09:57 PM, Richie Cyngler wrote:
I've had the same issue on RPi. I'm no backend Linux guy either but it seems problematic for Pd's available current version to be tied to an OS release.
why is this problematic?
the entire point of a distribution (which is a more accurate term than "OS"), is to ensure that all the components play together *nicely*. this works suprisingly well, given that Debian/stable (the one with Pd-0.46) has about 57000 software packages, that *all* play together nicely.
Is there some way around this?
it occurs to me, that i have posted one a number of times.
anyhow, I'm planning to provide backports once Debian/stretch has been released.
fgmrdsa IOhannes