Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I would also like to use this opportunity to extend an invitation to community members who may be interested in helping us improve the documentation, as well as porting our efforts to other platforms to please contact me and/or consider joining our l2ork-dev mailing list that can be found at http://disis.music.vt.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l2ork-dev
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Composition, Music Technology Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra Head, ICAT IMPACT Studio Virginia Tech Dept. of Music - 0240 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 (540) 231-5034 (fax) ico@vt.edu http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/bukvic/
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and
when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error:
pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
pd-l2ork)
András
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
(Ouch) OK :) I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source... On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :) I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from source. It's not 100% safe. Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source... On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :) I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to move to the deb model of distribution... On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from source. It's not 100% safe. Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source... On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :) I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Apologies for x-posting...
It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)." I assume adding a check to "make install" is the more complicated way.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to move to the deb model of distribution... On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from source. It's not 100% safe. Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source... On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :) I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.eduwrote:
> Apologies for x-posting... > > It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate > of > pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely > sporadic > bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first > "beta" > release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. > The > latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now > includes > over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well > as both > 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit > http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56 > > I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork)András
From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15. Many distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
I assume adding a check to "make install" is the more complicated way.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to move to the deb model of distribution...
On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from source. It's not 100% safe.
Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source...
On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :)
I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me. Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote: > >Apologies for x-posting... >> >>It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of >>pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic >>bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" >>release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The >>latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes >>over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both >>32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit >>http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56 >> >> >I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: >pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) >pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork) > >András >
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled
for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15. Many distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
András
From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu; "pd-list@iem.at" pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15. Many distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It might be on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much guaranteed to break. This is why it's such a pain-- you'd have to compile it yourself, and outside of the c compiler I can't think a more complex piece of software to compile manually.
-Jonathan
András
cd l2ork_addons/ ./tar_em_up.sh -u
I wouldn't call it that hard... On Nov 9, 2012 4:44 PM, "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu; "pd-list@iem.at" pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com
wrote:
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled
for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived
distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided
to skip
over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros,
according to what
I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to
2.15. Many
distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It might be on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much guaranteed to break. This is why it's such a pain-- you'd have to compile it yourself, and outside of the c compiler I can't think a more complex piece of software to compile manually.
-Jonathan
András
What does the "-u" flag do? It's not in the older version I have.
-Jonathan
From: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at; András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 4:50 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
cd l2ork_addons/ ./tar_em_up.sh -u I wouldn't call it that hard...
On Nov 9, 2012 4:44 PM, "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu; "pd-list@iem.at" pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15. Many distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It might be on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much guaranteed to break. This is why it's such a pain-- you'd have to compile it yourself, and outside of the c compiler I can't think a more complex piece of software to compile manually.
-Jonathan
András
For people like yourself who don't want to enable sudo. Other than that it is exactly the same as -f option. BTW, just tried building deb last night and it worked fairly easily. I just need to clean up dependencies and will start supporting that as well.
Also, there have been several releases since 1019. Latest 1108 introduces revamped Tidy (one press aligns according to closest axis, second press spaces objects evenly), and even better scrolling. Now, apart from a few lingering bug fixes, when trying to connect objects that don't fit on the same screen, the scroll follows the cursor and cord tip. On Nov 10, 2012 1:21 AM, "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
What does the "-u" flag do? It's not in the older version I have.
-Jonathan
From: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at; András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 4:50 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
cd l2ork_addons/ ./tar_em_up.sh -u I wouldn't call it that hard...
On Nov 9, 2012 4:44 PM, "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu; "pd-list@iem.at" pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com
wrote:
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read
"Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived
distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy
decided to skip
over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros,
according to what
I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to
2.15. Many
distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It
might be
on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much guaranteed to break. This is why it's such a pain-- you'd have to
compile it
yourself, and outside of the c compiler I can't think a more complex
piece
of software to compile manually.
-Jonathan
András
On 11/09/2012 10:44 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It might be on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much
btw, the above link gives _all official_ debian packages, including those in experiemntal.
fgmadr IOhannes
----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 5:33 AM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
On 11/09/2012 10:44 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy. It
might be
on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much
btw, the above link gives _all official_ debian packages, including those in experiemntal.
Oh, ok. I thought there was another one beyond Sid but I guess not.
-Jonathan
fgmadr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 11/10/2012 04:12 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Oh, ok. I thought there was another one beyond Sid but I guess not.
there is, and you were right that it's called "experimental".
i just wanted to point out, that packages.debian.org does not only list current stable, testing and unstable packages, but some auxiliary repositories as well (experimental, oldstable,...)
fddast IOhannes
-
András Murányi -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Ivica Bukvic -
Ivica Ico Bukvic
-
Jonathan Wilkes