hola,
sorry, i still find very annoying that pd won't let me declare a method with the following arguments :
A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT, A_SYMBOL
but, that i HAVE TO put all the symbols first ( at least with pd 0-37 test 4 ), like in :
A_SYMBOL, A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT
what's the status ??
sevy
Yves Degoyon wrote:
hola,
sorry, i still find very annoying that pd won't let me declare a method with the following arguments :
A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT, A_SYMBOL
but, that i HAVE TO put all the symbols first ( at least with pd 0-37 test 4 ), like in :
A_SYMBOL, A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT
what's the status ??
don't know but why not use A_GIMME ? (not very clean, but functional)
mfg.as.dr IOhannes
moin Yves, moin list,
I haven't tried this, but maybe using A_DEFSYM for the 2nd symbol arg might help?
marmosets, Bryan
On 23 November 2004 at 13:51:12, Yves Degoyon wrote:
hola,
sorry, i still find very annoying that pd won't let me declare a method with the following arguments :
A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT, A_SYMBOL
but, that i HAVE TO put all the symbols first ( at least with pd 0-37 test 4 ), like in :
A_SYMBOL, A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT
what's the status ??
sevy
You can declare messages with symbol, float, and symbol args in that order; the only thing is the arguments are sent to the C function with all the symbols first (symbol, symbol, float). It turned out to be much easier to implement that way, and no user ever sees the difference.
cheers Miller
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 01:51:12PM +0100, Yves Degoyon wrote:
hola,
sorry, i still find very annoying that pd won't let me declare a method with the following arguments :
A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT, A_SYMBOL
but, that i HAVE TO put all the symbols first ( at least with pd 0-37 test 4 ), like in :
A_SYMBOL, A_SYMBOL, A_DEFFLOAT
what's the status ??
sevy
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list