Hi,
I just noticed something. If anyone wants to open an array window (usually
named graphX), it is possible to send the command [vis 1( to that window,
as with any other pd window. But in case an abstraction is used, all
ocurrences of that abstraction have the same name. So, if I have 10 times
the same abstraction with a graph which I want to open directly, I can
only open all at the same time. Would it be possible/desirable to make an
individual naming scheme, so that each window would have it's autonomy?
For example, one sollution would be that the name of the window would be
dependent of the array name. If one array is called $0-graph, then [vis
1(--[send pd-$0-graph_W] or something sim. would open the array window. (I
guess that having the same name as the array itself might cause conflicts
João Miguel Pais
João Miguel Pais wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed something. If anyone wants to open an array window (usually named graphX), it is possible to send the command [vis 1( to
do you refer to the [table] object?
that window, as with any other pd window. But in case an abstraction is used, all ocurrences of that abstraction have the same name. So, if I have 10 times the same abstraction with a graph which I want to open directly, I can only open all at the same time. Would it be possible/desirable to make an individual naming scheme, so that each window would have it's autonomy?
if you are talking about the [table] object, why not use [table $0-array] ?
or do i miss something?
mfg.dr IOhannes
Hallo, IOhannes m zmölnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
João Miguel Pais wrote:
I just noticed something. If anyone wants to open an array window (usually named graphX), it is possible to send the command [vis 1( to
do you refer to the [table] object?
No, João is referring to "Put -> Graph".
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__