hi, is there a possibility to have a special type of variable for lists? until now I have a workaround with prepend, but that does not solve all problems... And I think it would be nice, if there was a possibilty to access to the local $0, $1... variables of a patch within a message(!). like [this message includes $$0 and $$1(. marius.
Hallo, Marius Schebella hat gesagt: // Marius Schebella wrote:
is there a possibility to have a special type of variable for lists? until now I have a workaround with prepend, but that does not solve all problems...
I'm not sure, I understand what you mean, but you can temporarily store variable lists in [lister]. But I suppose that is not what you mean.
And I think it would be nice, if there was a possibilty to access to the local $0, $1... variables of a patch within a message(!). like [this message includes $$0 and $$1(.
You can emulate this in almost all cases with [f $1] or [symbol $1],... then send it to a message, which has $1,... in it. [pack] is your best friend there.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
I'm not sure, I understand what you mean, but you can temporarily store variable lists in [lister]. But I suppose that is not what you mean.
I have a message with [one two $1 and the rest( and want to replace the $1 with a list of variable elementnumber.
And I think it would be nice, if there was a possibilty to access to the local $0, $1... variables of a patch within a message(!). like [this message includes $$0 and $$1(.
You can emulate this in almost all cases with [f $1] or [symbol $1],... then send it to a message, which has $1,... in it. [pack] is your best friend there.
I find it much easier to have access from within the message itself than having a pack, into which I load all the local variables with [loadbang] - [f $1]... which I have to trigger everytime I want to change an element of it. and then send it to a message and replace all the local variables from the packed list to message variables $1 $2 $3...
marius.
-
Frank Barknecht -
Marius Schebella