In terms of file-size and customisability, it would benefit from using an abstraction representing a row or a small chunk of rows.
...or by have elements dynamically created when the patch is loaded, say an n*m matrix with n and m as the creation args.
I'd like to improve [#many] so that it could make a variable number of rows of such a row-abstraction, but it'll take a long time to get there (symbols don't quite
fit in the model...)
Is this a new gridflow object? I have gf 1.0 (I'm running Pure Dyne these days)
Ed
| Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Ed Kelly wrote:
...or by have elements dynamically created when the patch is loaded, say an n*m matrix with n and m as the creation args.
that's what [#many] does... but it also organises the data in a grid of ints (soon will support floats)
I'd like to improve [#many] so that it could make a variable number of rows of such a row-abstraction, but it'll take a long time to get there (symbols don't quite fit in the model...)
Is this a new gridflow object? I have gf 1.0 (I'm running Pure Dyne these days)
There was never a version "1.0", but I think you have "0.9.6" or "0.9.7", back when I started writing "1.0" all over thinking that "1.0" was close, and then I told myself : fuck that, and then I renumbered it to "9.8" as a reverse April's Fools :
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2010-04/077410.html http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2010-04/077412.html
| Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC
-
Ed Kelly -
Mathieu Bouchard