I see [GEM] in some old subject lines. Is there a gem user/dev mailing list? I can't tell because of the way the mail is archived.
I have gem-0.84-2. It is a bear to compile under Linux. Is there anything more recent? I want to make sure before I start digging.
I wrote a pd abstraction for using the spaceorb when it is attached to js0 using jsattach and recent joystick drivers. Is the spaceorb external in GEM better/faster/more desireable? Is it cool to post .pd files here?
When I make abstractions with lots of inlets or outlets, they all bleed together. I have to put spurious text in the object to get the box wider; for example, not "sporb" but "sporb sporb sporb sporb sporb". Is there a better way to do this?
Has anyone yet tried using the GTK+ Tcl/Tk bindings with pd yet? They are still beta, but pd seems to have limited requirements of the graphics library. I think that pd only uses tcl as a graphics drawing language, and not as a general extension language (like jMax). Is that right?
I am like a small child with so many questions. Pd keeps me awake at night. Thank you all.
(jfm3)
Le Fri, 16 Feb 2001, jfm3 a écrit :
When I make abstractions with lots of inlets or outlets, they all bleed together. I have to put spurious text in the object to get the box wider; for example, not "sporb" but "sporb sporb sporb sporb sporb". Is there a better way to do this?
sporb___________ optional_arg1 optional_arg2 etc...
but there is no real solution right now.
Linium
BTW: Is there someone working on a "soundfont2" player already ? I have spent some time understanding how it is organized and right now have made an abstraction that can read the samples in a "soundfont2". It relies on "sf2text" command provided with the prog called "timidity" and there is a need to made some shell scripts to get the infos about layers and instruments. It is time consuming so if someone has already do this (or are merely interested) please let me know.
BTW2: could the reply field be changed so that we automaticly reply to the list rather than to the person who has posted to the list (or my mailer is faulty ?)
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:00:08AM +0100, Linium wrote:
BTW2: could the reply field be changed so that we automaticly reply to the list rather than to the person who has posted to the list (or my mailer is faulty ?)
i prefer not to activate this feature, because one might risk to send accidentally messages to the list which were meant for the poster only. most mailer programs feature something like a "group reply" or "reply all" which one can use to reply to the list.
norbert