Hello all,
I'm using pd 35-0 (under linux) and noticed an anoying problem. I was trying to decrease the cpu load of the "line" object and realized that the "grain size" argument does nothing.
"line 1" and "line 1000" behave identically.
I see to recall something else mentioning this, is it a known problem? have other people been able to reproduce?
I can't figure out an easy way to adapt counter to act just like line, but only sending out a number every second.
Thanks Ben
D'oh!
The line help window is wrong... there are two arguments to line, the initial value and then the time grain. So, line 0 1 line 0 1000
should act differently.
sorry about that; I wonder how many others have stubbed their toes on this one.
Miller
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:50:26PM -0500, bbogart@ryerson.ca wrote:
Hello all,
I'm using pd 35-0 (under linux) and noticed an anoying problem. I was trying to decrease the cpu load of the "line" object and realized that the "grain size" argument does nothing.
"line 1" and "line 1000" behave identically.
I see to recall something else mentioning this, is it a known problem? have other people been able to reproduce?
I can't figure out an easy way to adapt counter to act just like line, but only sending out a number every second.
Thanks Ben
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
hi,
Miller Puckette wrote: ...
The line help window is wrong... there are two arguments to line, the initial
...
I wonder how many others have stubbed their toes on this one.
I have reported this one (07/03/02 12:35).
While we are talking line, any plans to add 3rd inlet (grain control) and 2nd outlet (bang on target), or am I to add Line to the cyclone, just as I did with Line~?
But well... Line might be needed anyway, if there is a setclock feature in cyclone (not likely to happen soon, though).
Krzysztof