Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
Hello Every body
HP process makes the performance Kleine Maschine (new version) in
Valencia October 12 at OCTUBRE center.
And after, I will present the possibilities of Digital Action Poetry
with PMPD.
http://www.octubre.cat/activ_fitxa.php?id_activitat=923
best regards
philippe
I've used the various OSC controllers (MRMR, OSCemote, TouchOSC) and I've written some custom web apps to control things (I have some posts over at www.pillowsopher.com/blog). The OSC stuff is faster (more responsive and less latency) than the web stuff, but I liked the degree of control the web apps gave me. OSCemote is a nice compromise because you can create a UI using HTML and JavaScript.
andy
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Jerome Covington info@thespacebetweenthewords.org wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
:-) he is probably right for most of the cases.
But if you intended to do some intensive sound processing, or use a
multi input/output sound card,
... or use pd with some intensive video, or in collaboration with
other another software on the same computer (with localhost
communication)
or whatever else I didn't think about...
Then, you may be interested with other solutions as: OSCulator, http://www.osculator.net
Actually, I don't use it with an iPhone (I don't have one...) but with
a wiimote (even if there are some tools as externals for pd that can
also do this job but I found it stable convenient for the user
interface, visualizing the signals , battery monitoring etc...)
Else, maybe you can run pd on the iphone and send data with OSC to
another computer...
see also: http://music.blogdig.net/archives/articles/May2008/08/Tutorial__More_iPhone_...
loic
On 12 sept. 09, at 04:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use
the iPhone as a controller for pD?-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
I'm trying to implement in PD a resonant all pole filter, that I used
in max before.
It is using a biquad~ with some adequate coefficients.
So I make a patch reproducing the one in max, with respect to
compatibility with PD, it means that I change it a little so all the
objects used are now common to PD and Max.
And this patch is working in Max correctly. I tested it with Max 4.5,
Mac os 10.5.8 (I don't have Max 5).
the biquad~ is working with lowpass coefficient (using the 'lowpass'
external from ggee) but not with the coefficient that I want to use :-(
I thought that maybe the PD version was not accepting 0 values for the
second and third coefficient of the list so a put 0.000001 value
instead of 0 , but it doesn't seem to be this.
I had a look at Miller's code in the d_filter.c file, in [ static void
sigbiquad_list(t_sigbiquad *x, t_symbol *s, int argc, t_atom *argv) ]
t_float discriminant = fb1 * fb1 + 4 * fb2; t_biquadctl *c = x->x_ctl; if (discriminant < 0) /* imaginary roots -- resonant filter */ { /* they're conjugates so we just check that the product is less than one */ if (fb2 >= -1.0f) goto stable; } else /* real roots */ {... } /* if unstable, just bash to zero */ fb1 = fb2 = ff1 = ff2 = ff3 = 0;
and I saw something about a stable criteria 'discriminant' , I wonder
if it is maybe a reason why it is not working with my coefficient.
they are working in Max but not in PD.
if anyone know the answer, it will be very well come, it's still a
mystery for me.
best,
loic
here is my patch:
#N canvas 311 124 720 796 10; #X msg 256 523 0.0006 1e-06 1e-06 -1.98252 0.994522; #X msg 343 55 1; #X obj 343 31 loadbang; #X msg 184 71 20; #X obj 182 34 loadbang; #X msg 25 66 770; #X obj 25 43 loadbang; #X msg 398 621 0.000599788 0 0 -2 1; #X obj 398 598 prepend set; #X obj 245 657 dac~; #X obj 249 626 biquad~; #X obj 111 541 phasor~ 110; #X msg 448 90 44100; #X obj 448 65 loadbang; #X floatatom 381 56 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 239 59 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 120 66 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 343 77 t b f; #X obj 205 498 * 1; #X floatatom 218 273 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 464 374 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 79 292 expr 1-($f2/(2*$f1)); #X obj 460 337 f; #X obj 29 435 expr (1-$f1)*sqrt(1-2*$f1*cos(2*$f2)+($f1*$f1)); #X obj 444 116 / 2; #X obj 78 88 t b f; #X obj 225 218 / 22050; #X obj 95 110 * 3.14159; #X text 96 57 fc; #X text 196 54 Q; #X obj 249 565 pack 0.0006 0 0 -1.98252 0.994522; #X text 557 494 b2; #X obj 388 458 expr -2*$f1*cos($f2); #X obj 519 459 expr $f1*$f1; #X text 61 479 a0; #X text 395 479 b1; #X text 316 56 G; #X connect 0 0 30 0; #X connect 1 0 17 0; #X connect 2 0 1 0; #X connect 3 0 21 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 25 0; #X connect 6 0 5 0; #X connect 8 0 7 0; #X connect 10 0 9 0; #X connect 10 0 9 1; #X connect 11 0 10 0; #X connect 12 0 24 0; #X connect 13 0 12 0; #X connect 14 0 17 0; #X connect 15 0 21 0; #X connect 16 0 25 0; #X connect 17 0 21 0; #X connect 17 0 27 0; #X connect 17 1 18 1; #X connect 18 0 30 0; #X connect 21 0 22 0; #X connect 22 0 23 0; #X connect 22 0 32 0; #X connect 22 0 20 0; #X connect 22 0 33 0; #X connect 23 0 18 0; #X connect 24 0 26 1; #X connect 25 0 21 0; #X connect 25 1 27 0; #X connect 26 0 21 1; #X connect 26 0 19 0; #X connect 26 0 23 1; #X connect 26 0 32 1; #X connect 27 0 26 0; #X connect 30 0 10 0; #X connect 30 0 8 0; #X connect 32 0 30 3; #X connect 33 0 30 4;
hello Loic,
i'm not sure if pd and max biquad are the same structure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_biquad_filter pd use the direct form 2. i think that max use the form 1 (but may be wrong).
i made a bq~ object that use form 1 (and using audio input for the coef). maybe it will help. it is on the nusmuk folder in svn. don't know about pd-extended.
Cyrille
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to implement in PD a resonant all pole filter, that I used in max before. It is using a biquad~ with some adequate coefficients. So I make a patch reproducing the one in max, with respect to compatibility with PD, it means that I change it a little so all the objects used are now common to PD and Max. And this patch is working in Max correctly. I tested it with Max 4.5, Mac os 10.5.8 (I don't have Max 5). the biquad~ is working with lowpass coefficient (using the 'lowpass' external from ggee) but not with the coefficient that I want to use :-(
I thought that maybe the PD version was not accepting 0 values for the second and third coefficient of the list so a put 0.000001 value instead of 0 , but it doesn't seem to be this.
I had a look at Miller's code in the d_filter.c file, in [ static void sigbiquad_list(t_sigbiquad *x, t_symbol *s, int argc, t_atom *argv) ]
t_float discriminant = fb1 * fb1 + 4 * fb2; t_biquadctl *c = x->x_ctl; if (discriminant < 0) /* imaginary roots -- resonant filter */ { /* they're conjugates so we just check that the product is less than one */ if (fb2 >= -1.0f) goto stable; } else /* real roots */ {... } /* if unstable, just bash to zero */ fb1 = fb2 = ff1 = ff2 = ff3 = 0;
and I saw something about a stable criteria 'discriminant' , I wonder if it is maybe a reason why it is not working with my coefficient. they are working in Max but not in PD.
if anyone know the answer, it will be very well come, it's still a mystery for me. best, loic
here is my patch:
#N canvas 311 124 720 796 10; #X msg 256 523 0.0006 1e-06 1e-06 -1.98252 0.994522; #X msg 343 55 1; #X obj 343 31 loadbang; #X msg 184 71 20; #X obj 182 34 loadbang; #X msg 25 66 770; #X obj 25 43 loadbang; #X msg 398 621 0.000599788 0 0 -2 1; #X obj 398 598 prepend set; #X obj 245 657 dac~; #X obj 249 626 biquad~; #X obj 111 541 phasor~ 110; #X msg 448 90 44100; #X obj 448 65 loadbang; #X floatatom 381 56 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 239 59 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 120 66 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 343 77 t b f; #X obj 205 498 * 1; #X floatatom 218 273 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 464 374 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 79 292 expr 1-($f2/(2*$f1)); #X obj 460 337 f; #X obj 29 435 expr (1-$f1)*sqrt(1-2*$f1*cos(2*$f2)+($f1*$f1)); #X obj 444 116 / 2; #X obj 78 88 t b f; #X obj 225 218 / 22050; #X obj 95 110 * 3.14159; #X text 96 57 fc; #X text 196 54 Q; #X obj 249 565 pack 0.0006 0 0 -1.98252 0.994522; #X text 557 494 b2; #X obj 388 458 expr -2*$f1*cos($f2); #X obj 519 459 expr $f1*$f1; #X text 61 479 a0; #X text 395 479 b1; #X text 316 56 G; #X connect 0 0 30 0; #X connect 1 0 17 0; #X connect 2 0 1 0; #X connect 3 0 21 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 25 0; #X connect 6 0 5 0; #X connect 8 0 7 0; #X connect 10 0 9 0; #X connect 10 0 9 1; #X connect 11 0 10 0; #X connect 12 0 24 0; #X connect 13 0 12 0; #X connect 14 0 17 0; #X connect 15 0 21 0; #X connect 16 0 25 0; #X connect 17 0 21 0; #X connect 17 0 27 0; #X connect 17 1 18 1; #X connect 18 0 30 0; #X connect 21 0 22 0; #X connect 22 0 23 0; #X connect 22 0 32 0; #X connect 22 0 20 0; #X connect 22 0 33 0; #X connect 23 0 18 0; #X connect 24 0 26 1; #X connect 25 0 21 0; #X connect 25 1 27 0; #X connect 26 0 21 1; #X connect 26 0 19 0; #X connect 26 0 23 1; #X connect 26 0 32 1; #X connect 27 0 26 0; #X connect 30 0 10 0; #X connect 30 0 8 0; #X connect 32 0 30 3; #X connect 33 0 30 4;
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Thanks Cyrille, this is a very good thing!
it is also in extended apparently, but I didn't found it for for mac ,
the makefile is there so I tried a make...
but it seems that something is not well configure on the mac on which
I'm working right now(an old ppc), it doesn't recognize the 'make'
command ...hum ^^
even if the dev tools are installed (I'm sure as I compiled some stuff
with xcode some days ago)
let me know if there is already a mac version, if not I also have a
new iMac and I will work on it next week and try to make one.
On 12 sept. 09, at 16:14, cyrille henry wrote:
hello Loic,
i'm not sure if pd and max biquad are the same structure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_biquad_filter pd use the direct form 2.
...so in this case, I suppose there should be a different calculation
for the coefficients,. This could explains why it's not working.
thanks loic
i think that max use the form 1 (but may be wrong).
i made a bq~ object that use form 1 (and using audio input for the
coef). maybe it will help. it is on the nusmuk folder in svn. don't know about pd-extended.Cyrille
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Hi, I'm trying to implement in PD a resonant all pole filter, that I
used in max before. It is using a biquad~ with some adequate coefficients. So I make a patch reproducing the one in max, with respect to
compatibility with PD, it means that I change it a little so all
the objects used are now common to PD and Max. And this patch is working in Max correctly. I tested it with Max
4.5, Mac os 10.5.8 (I don't have Max 5). the biquad~ is working with lowpass coefficient (using the
'lowpass' external from ggee) but not with the coefficient that I
want to use :-( I thought that maybe the PD version was not accepting 0 values for
the second and third coefficient of the list so a put 0.000001
value instead of 0 , but it doesn't seem to be this. I had a look at Miller's code in the d_filter.c file, in [ static
void sigbiquad_list(t_sigbiquad *x, t_symbol *s, int argc, t_atom
*argv) ] t_float discriminant = fb1 * fb1 + 4 * fb2; t_biquadctl *c = x->x_ctl; if (discriminant < 0) /* imaginary roots -- resonant filter */ { /* they're conjugates so we just check that the product is less than one */ if (fb2 >= -1.0f) goto stable; } else /* real roots */ {... } /* if unstable, just bash to zero */ fb1 = fb2 = ff1 = ff2 = ff3 = 0; and I saw something about a stable criteria 'discriminant' , I
wonder if it is maybe a reason why it is not working with my
coefficient. they are working in Max but not in PD. if anyone know the answer, it will be very well come, it's still a
mystery for me. best, loic here is my patch: #N canvas 311 124 720 796 10; #X msg 256 523 0.0006 1e-06 1e-06 -1.98252 0.994522; #X msg 343 55 1; #X obj 343 31 loadbang; #X msg 184 71 20; #X obj 182 34 loadbang; #X msg 25 66 770; #X obj 25 43 loadbang; #X msg 398 621 0.000599788 0 0 -2 1; #X obj 398 598 prepend set; #X obj 245 657 dac~; #X obj 249 626 biquad~; #X obj 111 541 phasor~ 110; #X msg 448 90 44100; #X obj 448 65 loadbang; #X floatatom 381 56 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 239 59 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 120 66 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 343 77 t b f; #X obj 205 498 * 1; #X floatatom 218 273 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 464 374 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 79 292 expr 1-($f2/(2*$f1)); #X obj 460 337 f; #X obj 29 435 expr (1-$f1)*sqrt(1-2*$f1*cos(2*$f2)+($f1*$f1)); #X obj 444 116 / 2; #X obj 78 88 t b f; #X obj 225 218 / 22050; #X obj 95 110 * 3.14159; #X text 96 57 fc; #X text 196 54 Q; #X obj 249 565 pack 0.0006 0 0 -1.98252 0.994522; #X text 557 494 b2; #X obj 388 458 expr -2*$f1*cos($f2); #X obj 519 459 expr $f1*$f1; #X text 61 479 a0; #X text 395 479 b1; #X text 316 56 G; #X connect 0 0 30 0; #X connect 1 0 17 0; #X connect 2 0 1 0; #X connect 3 0 21 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 25 0; #X connect 6 0 5 0; #X connect 8 0 7 0; #X connect 10 0 9 0; #X connect 10 0 9 1; #X connect 11 0 10 0; #X connect 12 0 24 0; #X connect 13 0 12 0; #X connect 14 0 17 0; #X connect 15 0 21 0; #X connect 16 0 25 0; #X connect 17 0 21 0; #X connect 17 0 27 0; #X connect 17 1 18 1; #X connect 18 0 30 0; #X connect 21 0 22 0; #X connect 22 0 23 0; #X connect 22 0 32 0; #X connect 22 0 20 0; #X connect 22 0 33 0; #X connect 23 0 18 0; #X connect 24 0 26 1; #X connect 25 0 21 0; #X connect 25 1 27 0; #X connect 26 0 21 1; #X connect 26 0 19 0; #X connect 26 0 23 1; #X connect 26 0 32 1; #X connect 27 0 26 0; #X connect 30 0 10 0; #X connect 30 0 8 0; #X connect 32 0 30 3;#X connect 33 0 30 4;
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Thanks Cyrille, this is a very good thing! it is also in extended apparently, but I didn't found it for for mac , the makefile is there so I tried a make... but it seems that something is not well configure on the mac on which I'm working right now(an old ppc), it doesn't recognize the 'make' command ...hum ^^ even if the dev tools are installed (I'm sure as I compiled some stuff with xcode some days ago)
let me know if there is already a mac version,
i don't have one, and don't have any ppc computer. can't help.
Cyrille
if not I also have a new
iMac and I will work on it next week and try to make one.
On 12 sept. 09, at 16:14, cyrille henry wrote:
hello Loic,
i'm not sure if pd and max biquad are the same structure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_biquad_filter pd use the direct form 2.
...so in this case, I suppose there should be a different calculation for the coefficients,. This could explains why it's not working.
thanks loic
i think that max use the form 1 (but may be wrong).
i made a bq~ object that use form 1 (and using audio input for the coef). maybe it will help. it is on the nusmuk folder in svn. don't know about pd-extended.
Cyrille
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Hi, I'm trying to implement in PD a resonant all pole filter, that I used in max before. It is using a biquad~ with some adequate coefficients. So I make a patch reproducing the one in max, with respect to compatibility with PD, it means that I change it a little so all the objects used are now common to PD and Max. And this patch is working in Max correctly. I tested it with Max 4.5, Mac os 10.5.8 (I don't have Max 5). the biquad~ is working with lowpass coefficient (using the 'lowpass' external from ggee) but not with the coefficient that I want to use :-( I thought that maybe the PD version was not accepting 0 values for the second and third coefficient of the list so a put 0.000001 value instead of 0 , but it doesn't seem to be this. I had a look at Miller's code in the d_filter.c file, in [ static void sigbiquad_list(t_sigbiquad *x, t_symbol *s, int argc, t_atom *argv) ] t_float discriminant = fb1 * fb1 + 4 * fb2; t_biquadctl *c = x->x_ctl; if (discriminant < 0) /* imaginary roots -- resonant filter */ { /* they're conjugates so we just check that the product is less than one */ if (fb2 >= -1.0f) goto stable; } else /* real roots */ {... } /* if unstable, just bash to zero */ fb1 = fb2 = ff1 = ff2 = ff3 = 0; and I saw something about a stable criteria 'discriminant' , I wonder if it is maybe a reason why it is not working with my coefficient.
they are working in Max but not in PD. if anyone know the answer, it will be very well come, it's still a mystery for me. best, loic here is my patch: #N canvas 311 124 720 796 10; #X msg 256 523 0.0006 1e-06 1e-06 -1.98252 0.994522; #X msg 343 55 1; #X obj 343 31 loadbang; #X msg 184 71 20; #X obj 182 34 loadbang; #X msg 25 66 770; #X obj 25 43 loadbang; #X msg 398 621 0.000599788 0 0 -2 1; #X obj 398 598 prepend set; #X obj 245 657 dac~; #X obj 249 626 biquad~; #X obj 111 541 phasor~ 110; #X msg 448 90 44100; #X obj 448 65 loadbang; #X floatatom 381 56 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 239 59 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 120 66 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 343 77 t b f; #X obj 205 498 * 1; #X floatatom 218 273 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X floatatom 464 374 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 79 292 expr 1-($f2/(2*$f1)); #X obj 460 337 f; #X obj 29 435 expr (1-$f1)*sqrt(1-2*$f1*cos(2*$f2)+($f1*$f1)); #X obj 444 116 / 2; #X obj 78 88 t b f; #X obj 225 218 / 22050; #X obj 95 110 * 3.14159; #X text 96 57 fc; #X text 196 54 Q; #X obj 249 565 pack 0.0006 0 0 -1.98252 0.994522; #X text 557 494 b2; #X obj 388 458 expr -2*$f1*cos($f2); #X obj 519 459 expr $f1*$f1; #X text 61 479 a0; #X text 395 479 b1; #X text 316 56 G; #X connect 0 0 30 0; #X connect 1 0 17 0; #X connect 2 0 1 0; #X connect 3 0 21 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 25 0; #X connect 6 0 5 0; #X connect 8 0 7 0; #X connect 10 0 9 0; #X connect 10 0 9 1; #X connect 11 0 10 0; #X connect 12 0 24 0; #X connect 13 0 12 0; #X connect 14 0 17 0; #X connect 15 0 21 0; #X connect 16 0 25 0; #X connect 17 0 21 0; #X connect 17 0 27 0; #X connect 17 1 18 1; #X connect 18 0 30 0; #X connect 21 0 22 0; #X connect 22 0 23 0; #X connect 22 0 32 0; #X connect 22 0 20 0; #X connect 22 0 33 0; #X connect 23 0 18 0; #X connect 24 0 26 1; #X connect 25 0 21 0; #X connect 25 1 27 0; #X connect 26 0 21 1; #X connect 26 0 19 0; #X connect 26 0 23 1; #X connect 26 0 32 1; #X connect 27 0 26 0; #X connect 30 0 10 0; #X connect 30 0 8 0; #X connect 32 0 30 3;#X connect 33 0 30 4;
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Gotcha. Has anybody played with any rjdj scenes in a context where
the audience was greater then one? What worked, didn't work?
Regards, Jerome
On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
wrote:
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use
the iPhone as a controller for pD?-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
I'd like to try, but rjdj doesn't want to install thru itunes (mac) on my (old jailbroken) ipodtouch... Is there a way to install it on ipodtouch ?
fred
The Space Between the Words wrote:
Gotcha. Has anybody played with any rjdj scenes in a context where the audience was greater then one? What worked, didn't work?
Regards, Jerome
On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at> wrote:
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailto:Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-listhttp://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
My initial motivation was the ability to have a touch screen
controller, with pd running on my MacBook.
Regards, Jerome
On Sep 12, 2009, at 9:08 AM, fred-ordi ordi@fredvoisin.com wrote:
I'd like to try, but rjdj doesn't want to install thru itunes (mac)
on my (old jailbroken) ipodtouch... Is there a way to install it on
ipodtouch ?fred
The Space Between the Words wrote:
Gotcha. Has anybody played with any rjdj scenes in a context where
the audience was greater then one? What worked, didn't work?Regards, Jerome On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at
mailto:hans@at.or.at> wrote:I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to
use the iPhone as a controller for pD?-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailto:Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
<http://at.or.at/hans/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Does RJDJ do OSC? Then it would be quite simple...
D.
The Space Between the Words wrote:
My initial motivation was the ability to have a touch screen controller, with pd running on my MacBook.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:55 AM, The Space Between the Words info@thespacebetweenthewords.org wrote:
My initial motivation was the ability to have a touch screen controller, with pd running on my MacBook.
Yo Jerome - in that case I can unequivocally recommend TouchOSC. In the last month or two he released a GUI editor you can use to build any kind of control arrangement you like, and even before that I always felt it had the best controls of the bunch. I've used it for some live stuff and it was wonderful (it has a cool undocumented feature that you can grab a control on one screen, switch tabs and keep controlling the first control while grabbing a second control on the new tab with another finger... erm, try it out, maybe you'll get what I mean : ))
http://hexler.net/software/touchosc
There's also the very interesting Fantastick, which is essentially infinitely flexible, giving you direct draw access to the screen (and even some OpenGL) from Pd and direct multitouch access from Pd. I've played with that and it's very cool, but the visual responsiveness of course isn't quite as good as TouchOSC 'cuz of the round trip to get new drawing commands (and it's obviously a lot more labor). http://pinktwins.com/fantastick/
Both options have accelerometer support.
Best Luke
Regards, Jerome
On Sep 12, 2009, at 9:08 AM, fred-ordi ordi@fredvoisin.com wrote:
I'd like to try, but rjdj doesn't want to install thru itunes (mac) on my (old jailbroken) ipodtouch... Is there a way to install it on ipodtouch ?
fred
The Space Between the Words wrote:
Gotcha. Has anybody played with any rjdj scenes in a context where the audience was greater then one? What worked, didn't work?
Regards, Jerome On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at> wrote:
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailto:Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-listhttp://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Use the python proxy Chris wrote, it's in the composer tools download.
a.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:08:05 +0200 fred-ordi ordi@fredvoisin.com wrote:
I'd like to try, but rjdj doesn't want to install thru itunes (mac) on my (old jailbroken) ipodtouch... Is there a way to install it on ipodtouch ?
fred
The Space Between the Words wrote:
Gotcha. Has anybody played with any rjdj scenes in a context where the audience was greater then one? What worked, didn't work?
Regards, Jerome
On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at mailto:hans@at.or.at> wrote:
I think its more fun to run Pd on the iPhone itself:
.hc
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Would anybody care to share experiences working on projects to use the iPhone as a controller for pD?
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
Pd-list@iem.at mailto:Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-listhttp://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Andrew Turley -
Andy Farnell -
cyrille henry -
Derek Holzer -
fred-ordi -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Jerome Covington -
Loic Kessous -
Luke Iannini -
philippe boisnard -
The Space Between the Words
-
yjf