Am 19.11.2016 um 19:54 schrieb el jay fotorebelion@gmail.com:
actually i have a lot of stuff already made in PDP and PiDiP.. dont really feel like rewriting all my old stuff
I see. Sorry I have no help for you with that.
Am 19.11.2016 um 20:24 schrieb Bastiaan van den Berg buzz@spacedout.nl:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Johnny Mauser via Pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at wrote: Check out the gem library!
but Gem is neither PDP nor PiDiP, whats the point?
point was to answer this question:
hey there i want to do some vj patches with puredata..
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:04 PM, hi via Pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at wrote:
point was to answer this question:
i want to do some vj patches with puredata.
ah :)
indeed, gem is quite excellent for the non-sample-based VJ-ing
-- buZz
Hello,
Le 20/11/2016 à 00:33, Bastiaan van den Berg a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:04 PM, hi via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:
point was to answer this question: > i want to do some vj patches with puredata.ah :)
indeed, gem is quite excellent for the non-sample-based VJ-ing
What do you mean ? Maybe, i don't understand your sentence correctly but if you are talking about pixel as sample, Gem is quite excellent to manipulate pixel with the current Gem objects or with shaders too :) ++
Jack
-- buZz
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Jack jack@rybn.org wrote:
What do you mean ? Maybe, i don't understand your sentence correctly but if you are talking about pixel as sample, Gem is quite excellent to manipulate pixel with the current Gem objects or with shaders too :)
vj-ing samples are often snippets of video, at least on our sets :D
meaning sketches usually ended up just being a pile of videoplayers and mixers , for which PDP was a way better fit than Gem
-- buZz
-
Bastiaan van den Berg -
hi -
Jack