I generally use what I think the reader would be most interested in.
If there is something in the icmc96.ps paper that is related, I would
include that, otherwise, I use a misc entry with the http:// puredata.info URL.

.hc

On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:

Use the @MISC bibtex entry author: Puckette et al date: 1996

or you may prefer to cite this as a pointer

http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Publications/icmc96.ps

See for constructing MISC bibtex fields

http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~jacobsd/bib/formats/bibtex.html

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:43:43 -0800 "B. Bogart" ben@ekran.org wrote:

...

Hey all,

Is there a specific way to cite Pure-Data in an academic paper? R outputs a bibtex entry when you call cite(). Is there some
standard for PD?

OT: How is software generally cited?

Thanks, .b.

---

PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list

-- Use the source

---

PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list

Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a
more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in
practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith