Monaco is anti-aliased on bigger sizes, at least on the machines I've
tested on. I attached an example.
 .hc
On Oct 23, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
You're right. It looks like it's using regular Bitstream Vera Sans
rather than Mono? I have this line in my .pdrc -font-face "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono" Is that correct?Also, Pd-Extended defaults to Monaco on OS X, which is included,
but I don't like it since it is not anti-aliased (I posted about
that elsewhere).On 10/23/07, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote: The following lines:
sys_fontlist[i].fi_hostfontsize = atom_getintarg(3 * best + 2, argc, argv); sys_fontlist[i].fi_width = atom_getintarg(3 * best + 3,
argc, argv); sys_fontlist[i].fi_height = atom_getintarg(3 * best + 4,
argc, argv);are how Pd finds out the actual font size from teh Tk front end; in Pd extended the font patch comments these lines out, so Pd assumes the
font size is exactly as specified. This leads to problems like clicking
on one place and getting text selected in another. I never understood why
the lines were commented out.I'm not sure how wise it is to make a relase of Pd that depends on
having a particular font installed... looks like this breaks a lot of
machines.cheers Miller
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:01:16PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:Yup, you don't have Bitstream Vera Sans Mono working/installed. It has a distinctive lower L.
.hc
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Here's a new pic demonstrating the issue, by the way (I'll add it to the tracker) The 1px wide canvas is demonstrating where I am clicking, and the actual cursor is visible to show the result.
On 10/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) <lukexipd@gmail.com > wrote:
Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with the extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling in object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/ mtx_*~ and so on (though I believe IOhannes may have fixed that recently?).
What mismatched font cursor handling? If there's a bug, please report it on the tracker. :-)
I did, and apparently it was fixed : ). Anyway, the description is exactly the same: http://sourceforge.net/tracker /index.php? func=detail&aid=1650752&group_id=55736&atid=478070
Can this be reopened or should I submit a new one?
Cheers Luke
<Picture 1.png>
kill your television
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!