I was hoping Chris was going to do it :D
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:26 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
But then there's this thread in particular, where at least two perfectly capable developers chose to advocate for a trivial feature to be added to Pd rather than taking 10 minutes to implement it and make a "small, clean, self contained patch" as you suggest. Why do you think that is?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Also, where is a list foreach in the L2ork sources? I checked x_list.c, but it only has a note saying foreach is among the things to "Need to think more about": https://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd/blob/master/pd/src/x_list.c#L32
If it's there, I can try making a patch but I don't know where to look ...
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:08 AM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
I was hoping Chris was going to do it :D
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:26 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
But then there's this thread in particular, where at least two perfectly capable developers chose to advocate for a trivial feature to be added to Pd rather than taking 10 minutes to implement it and make a "small, clean, self contained patch" as you suggest. Why do you think that is?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
On 10/10/14 13:31, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Also, where is a list foreach in the L2ork sources? I checked x_list.c, but it only has a note saying foreach is among the things to "Need to think more about": https://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd/blob/master/pd/src/x_list.c#L32
If it's there, I can try making a patch but I don't know where to look ...
I think Jonathan was saying it's something he would like to do, not that he had done it yet. No need to make a patch as I have submitted one already.
Unless you think you can make a better patch than me. Them's fighting words!
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/clinteastwoodeyes.gif
Cheers,
Chris.
No, I probably can't make a better patch.
Also, before my last email might be read the wrong way, what I essentially meant was:
"Oh, you have code already working? Maybe I can look into porting it over into a patch."
what I did *not* mean was:
"Hey, why didn't you spend your free time doing it already? sheesh."
and
Thanks Chris, really. I need to donate to your beer fund again.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Chris McCormick chris@mccormick.cx wrote:
On 10/10/14 13:31, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Also, where is a list foreach in the L2ork sources? I checked x_list.c, but it only has a note saying foreach is among the things to "Need to think more about": https://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd/blob/master/pd/src/x_list.c#L32
If it's there, I can try making a patch but I don't know where to look ...
I think Jonathan was saying it's something he would like to do, not that he had done it yet. No need to make a patch as I have submitted one already.
Unless you think you can make a better patch than me. Them's fighting words!
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/clinteastwoodeyes.gif
Cheers,
Chris.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Ico does happen to have a [list cat] in Pd-l2ork. I'm not crazy about the interface, but I haven't thought of a better one yet.
-Jonathan
On Friday, October 10, 2014 1:59 AM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
No, I probably can't make a better patch.
Also, before my last email might be read the wrong way, what I essentially meant was:
"Oh, you have code already working? Maybe I can look into porting it over into a patch."
what I did *not* mean was:
"Hey, why didn't you spend your free time doing it already? sheesh."
and
Thanks Chris, really. I need to donate to your beer fund again.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Chris McCormick chris@mccormick.cx wrote:
On 10/10/14 13:31, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Also, where is a list foreach in the L2ork sources? I checked x_list.c,
but it only has a note saying foreach is among the things to "Need to think more about": https://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd/blob/master/pd/src/x_list.c#L32
If it's there, I can try making a patch but I don't know where to look ...
I think Jonathan was saying it's something he would like to do, not that he had done it yet. No need to make a patch as I have submitted one already.
Unless you think you can make a better patch than me. Them's fighting words!
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/clinteastwoodeyes.gif
Cheers,
Chris.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Chris McCormick -
Dan Wilcox -
Jonathan Wilkes