Dear list, hallo Thomas
just installed new version of pool-(using pd-0.39-1test1)
my pd is telling me: pool 0.2.2pre - hierarchical storage object, (C)2002-2005 Thomas Grill
When i open new file -new object-I write in "pool"-as soon as I click next to the object -the whole object is disappearing. but saving the patch shows me in the text file that the object is there. But on the other side I can open pool-help.pd--and pool is visible--but copying from there to the empty patch doesnt work.
This doesn't happen with pd 0.38-4-(there it works perfect)--is this magic disapperance because of pd-0.39?
thx Gerda
Hi Gerda,
just installed new version of pool-(using pd-0.39-1test1)
my pd is telling me: pool 0.2.2pre - hierarchical storage object, (C)2002-2005 Thomas Grill
When i open new file -new object-I write in "pool"-as soon as I click next to the object -the whole object is disappearing. but saving the patch shows me in the text file that the object is there. But on the other side I can open pool-help.pd--and pool is visible--but copying from there to the empty patch doesnt work.
This doesn't happen with pd 0.38-4-(there it works perfect)--is this magic disapperance because of pd-0.39?
yes, i think it is so, although i thought it would not happen with the current cvs versions anymore. I am suspecting that you compiled flext and PD against 0.38 and then used the same pool object with 0.39... is this true? If yes, could you try to compile flext and pool freshly against PD 0.39 headers (edit buildsys/config-pd-linux-gcc.txt beforehand, and do a "build.sh pd gcc clean") ? Seems i have to look closer into that issue....
best greetings, Thomas
Hi Tomas,
my pdversion is now Pd version 0.39-1 flext-is newly installed using 0.39-and pool is using the new flext-- unfortunately pool is still "disappearing" on the patch when I try to activate it. but after
yes, i think it is so, although i thought it would not happen with the current cvs versions anymore. I am suspecting that you compiled flext and PD against 0.38 and then used the same pool object with 0.39... is this true? If yes, could you try to compile flext and pool freshly against PD 0.39 headers (edit buildsys/config-pd-linux-gcc.txt beforehand, and do a "build.sh pd gcc clean") ? Seems i have to look closer into that issue....
best greetings, Thomas
Hi list,
my pdversion is now Pd version 0.39-1 flext-is newly installed using 0.39-and pool is using the new flext-- unfortunately pool is still "disappearing" on the pd-gui when I try to activate it.
However-on my old pd-0.38-4 pool now works fine.
Best
Gerda
p.s. sorry for sending wrong message before
yes, i think it is so, although i thought it would not happen with the current cvs versions anymore. I am suspecting that you compiled flext and PD against 0.38 and then used the same pool object with 0.39... is this true? If yes, could you try to compile flext and pool freshly against PD 0.39 headers (edit buildsys/config-pd-linux-gcc.txt beforehand, and do a "build.sh pd gcc clean") ? Seems i have to look closer into that issue....
best greetings, Thomas
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi Gerda, i tried hard but i couldn't reproduce the problem. I had no problems under Windows, OSX and gentoo-linux, with 0.38 or 0.39. Here i can also use pool compiled for 0.38 with 0.39 (which is what i expected).
I would highly appreciate positive or negative observations from other people using pool with 0.39. I remember a similar post some time ago (pre 0.39!) but i can't find it anymore.
gr~~~
Gerda Strobl wrote:
Hi list,
my pdversion is now Pd version 0.39-1 flext-is newly installed using 0.39-and pool is using the new flext-- unfortunately pool is still "disappearing" on the pd-gui when I try to activate it.
However-on my old pd-0.38-4 pool now works fine.
Best
Gerda
p.s. sorry for sending wrong message before
yes, i think it is so, although i thought it would not happen with the current cvs versions anymore. I am suspecting that you compiled flext and PD against 0.38 and then used the same pool object with 0.39... is this true? If yes, could you try to compile flext and pool freshly against PD 0.39 headers (edit buildsys/config-pd-linux-gcc.txt beforehand, and do a "build.sh pd gcc clean") ? Seems i have to look closer into that issue....
best greetings, Thomas
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
This doesn't happen with pd 0.38-4-(there it works perfect)--is this magic disapperance because of pd-0.39?
right ... you'll have to compile flext & pool against 0.39 ...
hth t
Hi all, a short followup on this issue... i went into Georg Holzmanns computer to update the sources, compile ind try out pool and everything worked as expected. So for everyone who has problems with disappearing flext-based objects, check the following:
- use flext and the externals from cvs and update it to the latest version
- check in your flext/buildsys/config-pd-linux-gcc.txt file that PDPATH
points to the pd version actually used (although this should be of no major imporance anymore)
- compile, install and enjoy
best greetings, Thomas
Gerda Strobl schrieb:
Dear list, hallo Thomas
just installed new version of pool-(using pd-0.39-1test1)
my pd is telling me: pool 0.2.2pre - hierarchical storage object, (C)2002-2005 Thomas Grill
When i open new file -new object-I write in "pool"-as soon as I click next to the object -the whole object is disappearing. but saving the patch shows me in the text file that the object is there. But on the other side I can open pool-help.pd--and pool is visible--but copying from there to the empty patch doesnt work.
This doesn't happen with pd 0.38-4-(there it works perfect)--is this magic disapperance because of pd-0.39?
thx Gerda
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Gerda Strobl -
Thomas Grill -
Tim Blechmann