Hi,
before re-inventing the wheel, do you have suggestions for (feedback) delay effects already available in PD like "ping-pong" delay, multi-tap delay, "cross" delay etc?
I know that there is fdn~ from creb library
but it is not completely clear to me how it manages
the stereo placement of the resulting signal...
thanks,
Alberto Zin
Hi Alberto,
alberto.zin@poste.it wrote:
before re-inventing the wheel, do you have suggestions for (feedback) delay effects already available in PD like "ping-pong" delay, multi-tap delay, "cross" delay etc?
All of these are easily built using [delwrite~], [delread~] and [vd~]. See attached patch from my workshop examples.
d.
Hallo, derek holzer hat gesagt: // derek holzer wrote:
All of these are easily built using [delwrite~], [delread~] and [vd~]. See attached patch from my workshop examples.
Small correction: The panner doesn't pan correctly. Attached is a fix.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Hey Frank,
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Small correction: The panner doesn't pan correctly. Attached is a fix.
Help me out here, cause I've been using that particular dirty-but-quick panner construction for years now. What is the difference between your version and mine? Seems like they both give a range from 0-1 to the left channel and the inverse of that to the right channel.
If I were less lazy, I'd go for an equal-loudness curve of course. But that's not what you fixed.
d.
Hi again,
derek holzer wrote:
Help me out here, cause I've been using that particular dirty-but-quick panner construction for years now. What is the difference between your version and mine? Seems like they both give a range from 0-1 to the left channel and the inverse of that to the right channel.
Never mind!!!!! I figured it out. There's one patch cable in the wrong place in my version. If that were fixed, our maths would be the same.
best, d.
Hallo, derek holzer hat gesagt: // derek holzer wrote:
derek holzer wrote:
Help me out here, cause I've been using that particular dirty-but-quick panner construction for years now. What is the difference between your version and mine? Seems like they both give a range from 0-1 to the left channel and the inverse of that to the right channel.
Never mind!!!!! I figured it out. There's one patch cable in the wrong place in my version. If that were fixed, our maths would be the same.
Yes, it's the same. My version might be slightly faster because it avoids a multiplication, but then it has a variable replacement in a message box, which also is a bit costly. Normally I use something like
[expr 1-$f1; $f1]
to do the splitting in one object but I once heard that you don't like [expr]. (Just joking ;)
Using [expr] for panning has the advantage to allow for writing alternative pannings in a very compact way like:
[expr sqrt(1-$f1); sqrt($f1)]
[expr cos(1.57 * $f1); sin(1.57 * $f1)]
Attached patch shows them all.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Hey Frank,
Frank Barknecht wrote:
I once heard that you don't like [expr]. (Just joking ;)
I failed every math class I ever took, which might explain my aversion to [expr]! ;-)
Attached patch shows them all.
Thanks for this. Did I mention lately that you rock?
d.
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 55: "Do the last thing first"
Attached patch shows them all.
thanks also for that;
keeps me away from some weired [line]-constructions, which
made me laugh somehow...
just subscribed new to the list, and wanted to say hello to everybody;
j ,.
Hallo, wind@mikrokiko.de hat gesagt: // wind@mikrokiko.de wrote:
Attached patch shows them all.
thanks also for that; keeps me away from some weired [line]-constructions, which made me laugh somehow...
just subscribed new to the list, and wanted to say hello to everybody;
Welcome on board!
Regarding [line]: let me add that my examples are deliberately simplified and don't have [pack 0 10]----[line~] after the [expr] outlets only because of that. Normally I always use [line~] or [line~] when multiplying a float number with a signal to avoid clicks.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
On Nov 12, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, derek holzer hat gesagt: // derek holzer wrote:
derek holzer wrote:
Help me out here, cause I've been using that particular dirty-but- quick panner construction for years now. What is the difference between
your version and mine? Seems like they both give a range from 0-1 to
the left channel and the inverse of that to the right channel.Never mind!!!!! I figured it out. There's one patch cable in the
wrong place in my version. If that were fixed, our maths would be the same.Yes, it's the same. My version might be slightly faster because it avoids a multiplication, but then it has a variable replacement in a message box, which also is a bit costly. Normally I use something like
[expr 1-$f1; $f1]
to do the splitting in one object but I once heard that you don't like [expr]. (Just joking ;)
Using [expr] for panning has the advantage to allow for writing alternative pannings in a very compact way like:
[expr sqrt(1-$f1); sqrt($f1)]
[expr cos(1.57 * $f1); sin(1.57 * $f1)]
Attached patch shows them all.
I put these three panning algorithms into objects in the "pan"
library, and added another odd one devised by a guy named gogins, and
included a GOP panner.
They are in the "pan" library in Pd-extended, or in CVS:
http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/hcs/pan/
.hc
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
publicity. - Bill Moyers
-
alberto.zin＠poste.it -
derek holzer -
Frank Barknecht -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
wind＠mikrokiko.de